• Piazza v. Young

    Publication Date: 2019-09-16
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
    Judge: District Judge Brann
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-1086

    Defendant fraternity members moved to dismiss claims brought against them by parents of pledge who died as a result of hazing and court found defendants had a duty of care, breached it and breach caused pledge's injuries but court also found Pennsylvania declined to extend liability based on the social host doctrine to cases in which the defendant was under 21 and dismissed the civil conspiracy claim. Motion granted in part and denied in part.

  • Pellegrino v. Transp. Sec. Admin.

    Publication Date: 2019-09-16
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Federal Government | Transportation
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Ambro
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 10-1091

    District court erred in holding that transportation security officers were not "investigative or law enforcement officers" as defined in the tort claims act at 28 U.S.C. §2680(h) because TSOs were officers of the United Sates empowered by law to execute searches and the searches were for violations of federal law. Reversed.

  • Feleccia v. Lackawanna Coll.

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Education | Entertainment and Leisure
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Dougherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-1027

    Athletic activity waiver did not immunize school that had undertaken duty to provide athletic trainers and where liable party could not seek waiver of gross negligence or reckless conduct. Order of the superior court affirmed in part and reversed in part, case remanded.

  • Slappy-Sutton v. Speedway LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-08-19
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Retail
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge DuBois
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0980

    Defendant moved to preclude the testimony of plaintiff's expert in plaintiff's action over his fall over a curb in a convenience store parking lot and court found expert's report met the requirements of "fit" under rule 702. Motion denied.

  • Nazarak v. Waite

    Publication Date: 2019-08-19
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Construction
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stevens
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0979

    Appellants appealed the jury finding and award of damages in favor of plaintiff in plaintiff's action arising from a vehicle collision and the court found trial court properly held that workers' compensation was not a collateral source, the admission of evidence of plaintiff's compromise and release with regard to his workers' compensation claim was not reversible error and plaintiff's vocational expert did not testify outside the scope of her report. Affirmed.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Allegheny County and Westmoreland County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Koch v. GGMP, LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-07-22
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Construction
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
    Judge: Judge Brown
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0796

    Plaintiff demonstrated a colorable claim for punitive damages where the evidence established that defendants' representative was concerned about certain trusses on a construction project and whether they were being placed properly but failed to take sufficient steps to protect plaintiff from injury. The court denied in part defendants' motion for summary judgment.

  • Forbes v. King Shooters Supply

    Publication Date: 2019-07-22
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Retail
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Massiah-Jackson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0786

    Statements by store personnel to law enforcement regarding plaintiff's behavior and need for mental health intervention were privileged. The court held defendants were entitled to judgment on the pleadings, because such statements were entitled to absolute immunity.

  • Rose v. Vilmatelo

    Publication Date: 2019-07-15
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Education
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Adams County
    Judge: Judge George
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0782

    Plaintiff was a college student who was injured by an inebriated participant at a fraternity function on campus. The court granted a preliminary objection dismissing the college as a party, because it had owed no duty to plaintiff.

  • Anderson v. U.S. Postal Service

    Publication Date: 2019-07-15
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Federal Government
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Savage
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0805

    Where the party contracting with the U.S. Postal Service to provide snow and ice removal services was an independent contractor exercising day-to-day supervision and control over its employees, the independent contractor exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act deprived the court of subject matter jurisdiction over the federal defendants. The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss.

  • Marshall v. Brown's IA, LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-07-08
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Food and Beverage | Retail
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Bowes
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0779

    Trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant's requested adverse inference jury charge, when store retained less than an hour of video surveillance of the site of appellant's fall despite letter from her counsel asking store to retain more than six hours of video, because there was no legal or factual support for trial court's finding that no relevant evidence was destroyed. Vacated.