• Rudolph v. Safari Club Int'l

    Publication Date: 2018-07-24
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Non-Profit
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
    Judge: District Judge Eddy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0683

    Defendant non-profit organization moved for summary judgment in plaintiff member's action for defamation and defamation by innuendo and court denied the motion as to the defamation count because plaintiff was not a limited public figure, the statements were not made solely in connection with his termination as an employee and there was no privilege, but the letter informing plaintiff that he was being removed from hunting awards and the record book did not support a claim for defamation by innuendo. Granted in part and denied in part.

  • Lichtenstein v. Lower Merion Sch. Dist.

    Publication Date: 2018-07-24
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Education | State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Baylson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0861

    Due process complaint based on injury caused by transport of special needs student dismissed on summary judgment where student had no "special relationship" with school and lack of reasonable foreseeability of harm or conscience-shocking conduct meant no state-created danger. Defendants' motion for summary judgment granted.

  • Mader v. Duquesne Light Co.

    Publication Date: 2018-07-24
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Construction | Energy
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Allegheny County
    Judge: Judge Herzberg
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0841

    The court awarded plaintiff's motion for a new trial as to damages for past medical expenses, lost profits, and pain and suffering, where the jury did not address any of those areas in its verdict.

  • Huff v. Moser et al

    Publication Date: 2018-07-24
    Practice Area: Motor Vehicle Torts | Personal Injury
    Industry: Construction
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Adams County
    Judge: Judge George
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0818

    Plaintiff's complaint failed to allege a viable claim for vicarious liability on the part of the defendant employer, who's employee allegedly struck and killed a victim while driving the company's car under the influence of alcohol, as none of the negligence allegations involved conduct committed during the course and scope of the driver's employment. The court granted employer's motion for summary judgment.

  • Slappy-Sutton v. Speedway LLC

    Publication Date: 2018-07-17
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge DuBois
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0836

    Defendant's motion for summary judgment was granted with respect to plaintiff's negligence claim for trip and fall over a curb because the curb presented an open and obvious condition. Motion granted.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Tax Handbook 2024

    Authors: Robert F. Connolly, MST, Susan K. Dromsky-Reed, Jeffrey D. Gordon, Tiffany Wagner Donio, Frances B. Stella, Alysse Mcloughlin, Kathleen Quinn

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Walters v. UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside

    Publication Date: 2018-07-10
    Practice Area: Class Actions | Personal Injury
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0770

    Superior court erred in imposing a duty on staffing agency but correctly imposed duty on hospital, in negligence action brought by patients infected with hepatitis C by technician's theft of a controlled substance, refiling the syringes with saline and placing the contaminated syringes where they could be used to infect patients, because the CSA imposed a duty on hospital but not on agency to report the thefts to the DEA. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

  • Lamelza v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP

    Publication Date: 2018-07-03
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Personal Injury
    Industry: Retail
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Brody
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0797

    Plaintiffs' remand motion was granted in their action against store for injuries in store parking lot because store's removal of case to federal court was beyond the 30-days allowed since the §1446(b)(3) exception did not apply where store made the argument that manager named as a defendant was not a proper defendant and did not work at the store in its answer to the state court complaint and the 30 days began to run on the date of the state court answer. Remand granted.

  • Anthony v. Parx Casino et al

    Publication Date: 2018-07-03
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Corporate Entities | Personal Injury
    Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Lazarus
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0783

    A corporation is not subject to venue based solely on the business activities of a sister corporation in the jurisdiction in question; therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sustaining the defendant casino's preliminary objections challenging venue in Philadelphia County. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order transferring venue.

  • Petroziello v. VisionQuest Nat'l Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2018-07-03
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Education
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
    Judge: Judge Nealon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0746

    In this personal injury matter, the complaint alleged negligent supervision by one of defendant's employees, so the court overruled defendant's preliminary objection regarding punitive damages.

  • Dickson v. Frein et al

    Publication Date: 2018-06-26
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
    Judge: Judge Nealon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0718

    Plaintiffs' allegations regarding the parents of an adult shooter who was allegedly a feeble-minded adult provided sufficient factual support for imposing a duty upon the parents to exercise reasonable care with respect to their son's access to their firearms. The court denied defendants' preliminary objection demurrers to plaintiffs' negligence claims.