Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Workers compensation appeal board properly found that claimant was injured in the course and scope of her employment where air-line employee was injured on the shuttle bus taking her to the employee parking lot because the shuttle bus was such an integral part of employers business as to be part of the premises and claimants presence on the bus was a necessary part of her employment because it was the means by which she traversed between her work station and the parking lot designated for employees.
The trial court did not err in finding that the business judgment rule protected the defendant companys decision to reject plaintiffs litigation demand given her failure to allege with particularity the wrongdoing at issue.
Trial court erred in denying appellants petition to expunge his involuntary commitment because appellants due process rights were vi-olated when appellant was not told of the §303 commitment hearing, he was not present at the hearing, the police officer was not present at the hearing, appellant never signed the commitment certification and he was not served with the certification or notified of his right to appeal.
Publication Date: 2018-03-13 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Strassburger Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0257
Trial court erred in failing to fulfill statutory mandate to appoint counsel for minor children in parental rights termination proceeding.
Defendant university was entitled to dismissal of former students claims alleging a violation of Title IX, negligence and violation of the UTPCPL but not his contract claim, after student was expelled for violating university policies against harassment, because the gist of the action doctrine barred his negligence claims and the economic loss doctrine barred his UTPCPL claims but student sufficiently alleged that university failed to provide notice and an opportunity to respond to the charges as required under the universitys polic
Plaintiffs were entitled to default judgment and an award in their ERISA action against defendant for failure to make the fringe benefit contributions to the multiemployer benefit plans required by the CBA because defend did not assert a meritorious defense, its failure to re-spond was culpable conduct and plaintiffs would suffer prejudice if the default were not granted.
The court denied one defendants motion to dismiss certain counts of plaintiffs complaint alleging negligence, battery and strict liability in an action based on exposure to benzene because plaintiffs sufficiently stated a claim for battery by alleging that defendant supplied benzene-containing solvents that were incorporated into benzene-containing products and placed those solvents into the stream of com-merce without any warnings or precautions.
Plaintiff failed to meet the standard for a preliminary injunction where a former employee did not possess marketing or pricing strategy information which constituted a trade secret.