0 results for 'undefined'
Products Liability Jury Test Shouldn't Include Phrase 'Unreasonably Dangerous'
As the Tincher court addressed the historical rationale for strict liability in product cases and grappled with the niceties and distinctions between tort principles of negligence and strict liability, the court embraced two legal tests jurors should be instructed to use in deciding whether a product is defective: the consumer expectation test (CET) and the risk utility test (RUT).Credits for Superfund Settlement Payments and What That Means for Settlement Strategy
When several parties are responsible for a Superfund site, often some parties resolve their obligations to the government before other parties. How the government and the courts account for those settlements matters to the exposure of the remaining parties.DFS Continues Long History of Strongly Supporting Anti-Fraud Reg
Insurance Fraud columnist Evan H. Krinick writes: Nearly two decades ago, in 2001, New York state's insurance regulator promulgated a powerful anti-fraud regulation intended to require that a health care provider, as a condition of eligibility for no-fault reimbursement, be owned and controlled by licensed physicians and not by non-physicians who disguise their ownership and control and secretly siphon all profits away from the physician whose name appears on the license issued by the state. As DFS has once again just reiterated, a medical professional corporation (PC) is ineligible for no-fault insurance reimbursement if it fails to meet any condition of licensure, including the requirement of physician control.Can Law Firms Keep Young Lawyers Happy?
In talking with optimistic and motivated attorneys, a few solutions for law firms present themselves.Slaughters Advising As EY Seeks to Challenge Competition Watchdog
The Competition and Markets Authority last month proposed sweeping legislative changes to the auditing market, which EY has criticised.View more book results for the query "*"
Supreme Court Considers Greatest Judicial Power Grab Since 'Marbury v. Madison'
The U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether to limit the power of administrative agencies. 'Kisor v. Wilkie,' which was argued last month, is a head-on challenge to the deference afforded to an agency when interpreting its own regulations.Don't Be Like Mike (Avenatti): Idle Your Threats of Negative Publicity
When you threaten adversaries with negative publicity, you are playing with fire.Dilworth Partner Joshua Wolson Confirmed to EDPA Bench
The 65-33 vote came late Thursday morning, nearly one year after President Donald Trump nominated Wolson for the position.Clifford Chance Aims to Scrap Billable Hours to Measure Performance
The firm is piloting a scheme to move away from basing lawyer compensation on the metric.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
The Essential Guide to Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Brought to you by Diligent Corporation
Download Now
2024 Trends Report Mid-Year Special Edition: Update on Outside Counsel Billing Rates
Brought to you by LexisNexis® CounselLink®
Download Now
AI in Private Equity: A Guide for Gaining an Early Advantage
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now
Why Are So Many Law Firms Suddenly Embracing Digital Transformation?
Brought to you by AllRize
Download Now