0 results for 'undefined'
High Courts Rightly Hold Internet 'A Basic Need'
U.S. and New Jersey Supreme Court decisions strongly and admirably make crystal clear the importance of the internet in the today's marketplace of ideas, as well as the importance of protecting the right to exchange ideas in that medium—even by convicted sex offenders.Lawmakers, Amend Youth Marriage Bill As Christie Urges
Although Christie's conditional veto will not change matters for older teenagers, we urge the Legislature to accept his proposed changes so that young teenagers will be protected. It is at least a first step in the right direction.Commonwealth v. Banks, PICS Case No. 17-0971 (Pa. Super. June 12, 2017) Moulton, J. (9 pages).
Trial court erred in granting motion to suppress based on investigatory detention unsupported by reasonable suspicion where such a basis to suppress was not asserted by defendant, who instead simply challenged the lack of reasonable suspicion for the subsequent search. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.View more book results for the query "*"
Commonwealth v. Wendel, PICS Case No. 17-0973 (Pa. Super June 7, 2017) Stevens, J. (14 pages).
The commonwealth did not act without due diligence in violation of Pa. R. Crim. P. 600 where a witness, the affiant and lead investigator in this criminal case, became unavailable due to circumstances beyond the commonwealth's control. The court affirmed a trial court order denying defendant's motion to dismiss.New York, New York, a Helluva Town ... for Law Firms?
Is there a secret to the failure of so many firms to challenge the city's established elite? Or is their failure overstated?Hildebrand v. EQT Prod. Co., PICS Case No. 17-0979 (Pa. Super. June 8, 2017) Stabile, J. (14 pages).
Trial court erred in denying appellants' motion for summary judgment, in their declaratory judgment action over royalty payments, because court erroneously interpreted the lesser interest clause included solely in appellants' modification of the original 1928 oil and gas lease. Reversed.In the Interest of RK, PICS Case No. 17-0929 (C.P. Lycoming Jun. 8, 2017), McCoy, J. (6 pages).
Evidence of drug paraphernalia obtained from a warrantless search of a juvenile's backpack was inadmissible, because the juvenile did not consent to the search and none of the search warrant exceptions applied. The court granted the juvenile's motion to suppress.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
CFIUS Compliance: Your Organization's Growth and Investment Strategy May Be a Matter of National Security
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Document Review Challenges: Strategies for Law Firm Litigation Professionals in 2024
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
From Burnout to Breakthrough: How Technology Enhances Legal Wellness
Brought to you by Nuix
Download Now
The 2024 Benchmark of Ethical Culture Report
Brought to you by LRN
Download Now