0 results for 'undefined'
Judge Brady Assigned to Middlesex Co. Civil Part
Notice to the bar.Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 6, No. 116 -- June 18, 1998
Bridge et al v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co. et al
A plaintiff asserting a RICO claim predicated on mail fraud need not show, either as an element of its claim or as a prerequisite to establishing proximate causation, that it relied on the defendant's alleged misrepresentations.Suits trying to hold mortgage-backed securities trustees liable for MBS losses haven't been at the forefront of investor litigation spawned by the mortgage crisis. But a ruling Monday in a putative class action against Bank of America and U.S. Bancorp reaffirms that such claims spell big trouble for banks.
View more book results for the query "*"
'Mere Employees' Not Criminally Liable for Dumping Solid Waste
An employee who was not responsible for obtaining the necessary permits for dumping tires could not be held criminally responsible for the failure to get such permits, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held. In rejecting the state's claim that the Solid Waste Management Act should apply to "any person," Judge Rochelle Friedman said "such an interpretation would lead to unreasonable and absurd results."The Virtual Landscape for Environmental Lawyers
Environmental lawyers may have down-to-earth practices, but they can find more and more virtual help these days. Attorneys themselves have created some of the most useful Web sites for other environmental lawyers. From agency documents and fact sheets to litigation trends and regulatory calendars, the environmental lawyer -- green or not -- can find a wealth of information on the Web.Brookfield, represented by Jenner & Block, filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no further obligations to AIG and its Financial Products unit.
Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 14, No. 73 - April 17, 2006
Troubling Precedent From Commonwealth Court
To say that the Commonwealth Court case of DePue v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (N. Paone Construction) is troubling is a vast understatement. The court sets a very dangerous precedent regarding the finality of the compromise and release agreement (C&R), which warrants great attention on the part of the claimant's practitioner when preparing the agreement. Moreover, it may have a chilling effect on settlements, given the great specificity of the settlement language that the decision imposes.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
The Essential Guide to Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Brought to you by Diligent Corporation
Download Now
2024 Trends Report Mid-Year Special Edition: Update on Outside Counsel Billing Rates
Brought to you by LexisNexis® CounselLink®
Download Now
AI in Private Equity: A Guide for Gaining an Early Advantage
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now
Why Are So Many Law Firms Suddenly Embracing Digital Transformation?
Brought to you by AllRize
Download Now