By David Thomas | March 3, 2020
The departures come one month after Irell & Manella announced its plans to focus only on high-value litigation work in intellectual property and complex commercial litigation.
By Alaina Lancaster | March 2, 2020
A federal judge in San Francisco ruled a Redditor's posts citing Watch Tower's copyrighted works were fair use but that online free speech "is a developing area where the standards are far from settled."
By Sue Reisinger | March 2, 2020
Fifty top legal officers of U.S. corporations sent a letter Monday urging the federal courts system to clarify a rule that sets standards for the use of expert testimony. The in-house counsel say courts too often are allowing juries to hear expert opinions. not based on scientific evidence.
By Ross Todd | March 2, 2020
A federal magistrate judge granted Nextiva's motion to dismiss claims that it faked online reviews about cloud-based communications service rival RingCentral, but gave RingCentral a chance to amend its complaint.
By Amanda Bronstad | March 2, 2020
Apple Inc. has agreed to pay between $310 million and $500 million to settle class actions alleging that it surreptitiously slowed older iPhones with software upgrades. The deal would include potentially $25 payments to class members and $93 million in attorney fees.
By C. Ryan Barber | March 2, 2020
"At a minimum, by Wednesday, I think you can get an affidavit from a corporate representative," U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich of the District of Columbia in Washington told lawyers from Reed Smith, representing Concord Management and Consulting in a Mueller-related case.
By Jacqueline Thomsen | March 2, 2020
The Democratic legislation includes a code of ethics for the justices, free PACER access for most users and live streaming of Supreme Court arguments, according to Fix the Court.
By C. Ryan Barber | February 28, 2020
As trial approaches in a legacy Mueller case, prosecutors and Reed Smith defense lawyers are feuding over subpoenas—and a Washington federal judge on Monday will hear arguments over whether to hold the law firm's client in civil contempt.
By Ross Todd | February 28, 2020
U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer of the Northern District of California opened the hearing by saying that he clearly thought that the plaintiffs had standing to sue. "I think there was injury, and I think that it's an important vindication of an individual's rights to be able to seek redress in a court for an injury, especially for an injury for privacy," Breyer said.
By Sue Reisinger | February 28, 2020
When an event happens, "you need to know what clauses you have in contracts that alter your risk," one expert says. "And you want AI doing that, not an army of interns in your legal department."
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...