The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | November 5, 2019
The federal appeals court on Monday certified two questions of first impression to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, stemming from a class action lawsuit claiming that practices at Amazon's warehouse outside Allentown, Pennsylvania, violate the Keystone State's minimum wage laws.
By Alaina Lancaster | November 4, 2019
In addition to repurposing regulatory production documents, a federal judge could ask the company to provide more information on how its millions of apps interact with users. Gibson Dunn's Orin Snyder rebutted that there were "not enough engineers on the globe" to perform the task.
By Alaina Lancaster | November 4, 2019
The ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit continues to sketch the limits of the Fourth Amendment in digital searches.
By Amanda Bronstad | November 4, 2019
Lieff Cabraser's Anne Shaver, representing the plaintiffs, got a lot of questions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit about Microsoft's employment practices. Citing Walmart v. Dukes, Judge Johnnie Rawlinson told her, "I don't feel there is a policy that's been pointed out."
By Zach Schlein | November 1, 2019
Attorney Alex Alvarez spearheaded the development of Momus Analytics and touts it as the first software to use comprehensive data to rate jurors and predict how they'll impact a case.
By Patrick Smith | November 1, 2019
Which outside deal lawyers does Google have to thank for its latest acquisition? Strangely enough, it depends on whom you ask.
By Jenna Greene | November 1, 2019
'My philosophy is don't settle; just win. But settlement can make sense when the business people can work things out directly, which is what we were able to do here.'
By Amanda Bronstad | October 31, 2019
One day earlier, Facebook won a stay of a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruling affirming class certification in another privacy case, which it plans to bring to the U.S. Supreme Court.
By Ross Todd | October 31, 2019
Some of the same plaintiffs lawyers who reached a settlement with Facebook in March over ads for housing, employment and credit opportunities that excluded protected classes sued the company again claiming it still allows advertisers for financial services to discriminate against women and older users.
By Alaina Lancaster | October 30, 2019
The company's lawyers at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher contend in a new court filing that Uber drivers' classification as contractors remains unchanged despite the California Supreme Court's 'Dynamex' decision, the passage of the state's AB 5, and a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...