By Trudy Knockless | April 24, 2023
David Hyman and the company's other top executives saw compensation rise in 2022, even as Netflix shares tumbled.
By Adolfo Pesquera | March 2, 2023
"The only real pleading deficiency raised by appellees in their motion to dismiss was appellant's failure to sufficiently identify herself in her pleadings," Justice Amanda Reichek wrote.
By Adolfo Pesquera | November 18, 2022
The district court thought authority was balanced by the FTC's equally sweeping oversight, but the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority restricts FTC review of the authority's proposed rules, the court said.
By Adolfo Pesquera | November 11, 2022
The dispute hinged on whether to consider New York-based Sirius' monthly subscription fees from Texas users as revenue from a service performed in Texas—and subject to higher taxes—than if they resulted from activity performed outside the state.
By Adolfo Pesquera | November 8, 2022
As of today, this equates to a valuation for FanDuel of $22 billion and a cost of $4.1 billion for FOX, twice what the company asserted it should have to pay.
By Adolfo Pesquera | October 31, 2022
The defendants claimed that Bobby Goldstein Productions had given express or nonexclusive license to copy, distribute and use the videos.
By Greg Andrews | October 25, 2022
Los Angeles-based Viet Dinh has been the media company's legal chief since 2018 but didn't get licensed in California until this summer, potentially weakening his right to claim attorney-client privilege for his communications with fellow execs.
By Adolfo Pesquera | October 25, 2022
Defendants McLane Champions and Comcast Corp. sought to get the lawsuit dismissed based on the argument that any communications relating to the sale was protected under the Texas Citizens Participation Act.
By Adolfo Pesquera | October 21, 2022
"The question at issue in Honeycutt was whether the attorney ... could recover against his former client. It does not establish that the attorney may recover his fees from the defendant in the lawsuit." the 13th Court of Appeals ruled.
By Colleen Murphy | September 1, 2022
"Here, it is the assignability of legal malpractice claims that presents the conflict of laws," the judge stated. "We therefore focus our inquiry on which state has the most significant relationship to the assignability of the legal malpractice claim asserted against Attorney Brown."
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
The New England Legal Awards serves as a testament to the outstanding contributions and achievements made by legal professionals.
Mid sized NYC Personal Injury Defense Firm seeking to immediately hire several attorneys to join our firm. Preferred candidates are those w...
Mid-size Parsippany based law firm with a statewide practice is searching for a full-time motivated associate litigation attorney with 3-5 y...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in Princeton, NJ for an associate in the Litigation Department. The ideal candidate will have tw...