Should Law Firms Embrace Artificial Intelligence and R&D Labs?
There is a puzzle in the legal business. Our economic landscape is filling up with innovative organizations who have embraced the convergence of technology and business to meet new market demands, yet the legal market remains conservative.
May 18, 2018 at 11:57 AM
4 minute read
There is a puzzle in the legal business. Our economic landscape is filling up with innovative organizations who have embraced the convergence of technology and business to meet new market demands, yet the legal market remains conservative.
This year at the Legal Marketing Association (LMA) Annual Conference, there was increased chatter about research and development (R&D) labs and artificial intelligence (AI) for the legal industry.
Brian Kuhn, Watson Business Solutions executive for IBM, said AI is becoming common practice in many industries, especially in health care, which is embracing advancements and redefining delivery models to create new client offerings.
As is typical for the legal market, clients are driving change—particularly larger and more sophisticated consumers of legal services who have legal operations professionals streamlining corporate legal departments. Take for instance, Kimberly Bell, head of operations, legal/external affairs for Nissan Group of America, who uses lawyer robots to complete work typically performed by law firm associates. The cost to Nissan? $10,000 per year. This economical solution frees up time for associates to focus on higher level work and client-facing business efforts. And the entrepreneurial behavior helps to fuel Nissan's bottom line.
Even so, Kuhn warns that the broader legal industry is slower to adapt, and this delay will ultimately hurt our industry.
Let's define research and development in the business sense for a moment. R&D comes in many forms and it refers to activities that a business undertake in the hope of development of new or the improvement of current products, services and procedures.
Last year, total spending on R&D by the world's 1,000 largest companies was about $702 billion, according to the 2017 Global Innovation 1000 study. Typically, businesses outside of legal invest about 3.5 percent of their annual revenues on R&D.
While many forge ahead toward the increased use of AI, metrics and other analytical tools that enable job performance and increased production, the legal industry still has a ways to go to reshape how attorneys more creatively engage with each other and with clients.
Even if your law firm is disinclined to invest in a R&D department, an idea lab or design thinking, small improvements in everyday work life can add up to meaningful impact.
A culture that supports idea generation and awards its people, not just its partners, is almost always at an advantage. A few years ago, Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed held a firmwide competition to bring new ideas from every corner of the firm. The best ideas were selected out of that exercise and committees were created to develop those ideas further.
Another way to focus on R&D is to allow, and reward, space and time to explore and study market trends. Business development and knowledge management professionals can collaborate on research to identify niche markets and hyper-specialties so that attorneys can establish themselves as market leaders in a specific space. The new findings may be added or tweaked in practice groups to better serve clients.
Additionally, holding conversations with clients about their challenges and barriers they need to overcome also generates innovation inside law firms. These types of activities change the traditional law firm talent model to a solutions-oriented law firm model.
Encouragingly, the 2018 LMA/Bloomberg Law research survey reported the rise of newer specialties such as practice management, process improvement, pricing, competitive intelligence and technology. Additionally, we are hearing about new titles like chief pricing officers, client experience managers, futurists and so on.
Change is difficult, especially in the legal market. Yet a firm's willingness to think differently reflects its ability to adapt, to ensure sustainability for itself, and to help solve that industrywide puzzle.
Ioana Good is the immediate past president of the Legal Marketing Association for the Southeast Region, and this year she is leading the R&D arm for the organization. She manages business development and communications for Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed. Contact her at [email protected].
Kathryn B. Whitaker is a member of the Legal Marketing Association board of directors, and director of marketing & business development at McNair Law Firm. She can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
Neighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readSeven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 2
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Starbucks Sues Ex-Executive to Recover $1M Signing Bonus
- 2Navigating AI Risks: Best Practices for Compliance and Security
- 320 New Judges? Connecticut Could Get Wave of Jurists
- 4Orrick Loses 10-Lawyer Team to Herbert Smith in Germany
- 5‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Legal Arm of the Big Four Firm Entering the US
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250