Would You Rather? How to Use This Party Game to Enhance Your Marketing
The party game “Would You Rather?” has spawned internet memes, Buzzfeed quizzes, drinking games, brand advertisements and lists upon lists of themed questions (life questions, moral questions, food questions, dirty questions and questions for kids, to name a few).
April 22, 2019 at 03:59 PM
7 minute read
The party game “Would You Rather?” has spawned internet memes, Buzzfeed quizzes, drinking games, brand advertisements and lists upon lists of themed questions (life questions, moral questions, food questions, dirty questions and questions for kids, to name a few). It's also a board game, a funny British quiz show and a really terrifying movie.
You know the rules. You have to pick one of the two offered options. And you can't answer “neither” or “both.”
Let's play!
Would you rather:
- Be rich or famous? (Rich—who needs fame anyway?)
- Be able to teleport anywhere or be able to read minds? (Teleport please! I really don't want to know what anyone else is thinking.)
- Eat pizza for every meal or never eat pizza again? (I'd have to go with never again. I love good pizza, but not for every meal.)
How about this one:
Would you rather get a new client or get more work from an existing client?
I know which one I would pick (read to the end of the article to find out).
What's your answer?
I can hear you grumbling from here.
“Wait, what? I have to choose? Why can't I have both?”
You absolutely can. This is real life, not a party game.
That said, this “would I rather” question (or some form of it) is something you should be asking yourself regularly as part of your business development plan. Here are some considerations for finding the right answer for you.
- It costs more to get a new client than get more work from an existing client.
And not just more money, but more of all of your resources, the most precious of which is your time, and the time of your marketing and business development professionals.
In sales, it's called the “cost of customer acquisition” and it's always higher than the “cost of customer retention.” Sometimes a lot higher. In 2015, BTI Consulting estimated the cost of acquiring a new client at eight to 12 times the cost of acquiring business from an existing client —and predicted that the cost would only increase with the tightening market.
Your cost of customer acquisition depends on your practice, the types of clients you want to attract, who their decision makers are and how they buy legal services. Notwithstanding those variables, attracting new clients (the right way) requires you to spend time, effort (and money on:
- Identifying potential new clients in your existing markets or identify new markets
- Qualifying and segmenting those leads—are they good prospects with high potential?
- Figuring out how those prospects buy legal services
- Implementing appropriate marketing and business development strategies
The process of landing a single new client can be intensely time and resource consuming. Consider the extraordinary time and effort it takes respond to an RFP, never mind the groundwork you have to lay just to get invited to participate in the process in the first place.
Conversion rates—turning prospects into clients—are typically low, so you need to market to a lot of leads to land one new client. And because the research continues to show a strong personal element in legal hiring practices, it can take years to develop enough of relationship with legal decision makers to get hired (even once you make the preferred provider list). Keeping a long pipeline filled with high-potential leads can be a drain on you and your resources—resources that might be better directed elsewhere.
- Client retention is a cost-effective way to get new work.
Nurturing existing client relationships is critical in today's ultra-competitive legal services market. Remember the estimated cost differential for acquiring versus retaining clients—eight to 12 times more costly?
That means that when you lose a client, you not only lose the revenue from that client, you also have to spend a lot more to replace the revenue.
And while it usually takes a major problem for a client to change lawyers or firm in the middle of a transaction or litigation, the more typical scenario is that the client quietly begins giving work to others. By the time you notice that the work has dried up, it's usually too late.
The good news is that the time, energy and effort you spent nurturing your existing client relationships can reap the dividend of new—and different—work.
Often getting more work from a client can be as simple as asking for it. An opportune time can be at the end of a successful representation, but if you're actively working to enhance the client experience, you'll have many “right times” to make the ask.
Good client retention efforts also give you the advantage in selling your client on the services of other lawyers or practices in your firm. Convergence—reducing the number of external law firms that a single business uses—is a real phenomenon in the legal industry. And one of the most often-repeated sentiments of general counsel and other legal services decision makers is that they want to work with lawyers and firms that really know their businesses and their industries. Counsel that understands their goals and objectives, and can proactively help them identify and address their problems and challenges.
As their current lawyer, you have a head start. You've (hopefully) ascended that steep learning curve. To get more and different work from your existing clients, you need to regularly reinforce the point that they already have legal counsel that knows their business (that's you) and to educate them about the services that your colleagues can provide.
- Focusing on your existing clients can lead to new clients.
Despite the plethora of today's technology-enhanced marketing and business development tools (which, don't get me wrong, can play a vital role in your efforts to grow revenue), one of the biggest drivers in legal services hiring remains the personal referral. And one of your best sources of referral is your existing client base. Referrals and recommendations are especially important if you practice in a specialized area or concentrate on a specific industry market sector or geographical region. In fact, it's ultimately self-defeating to lose sight of keeping your existing clients happy in the pursuit of new clients.
- And the answer is …
As promised, here is my answer to the question “Would you rather get a new client or get more work from an existing client?”
It depends.
Yeah, I know, that violates the basic rules. But as I said, this is real life.
I say “it depends” because, unlike the party game, seeking out new clients and getting more work from existing clients are not mutually exclusive options.
That said, because your resources—especially your time—are all limited in some way, the real (not party) trick is to know when incurring the higher cost of client acquisition is worth it.
Maybe looking for new clients is your best option for bringing in more revenue right now, given market conditions. Perhaps you've reached saturation point with your existing clients. Or, fortuitously, opportunities exist for growth in new industries or sectors that you want dedicate the resources to exploring.
In other words, no right answer exists to this “would you rather” question. As long as you are making an educated and strategic decision, either choice—or both—has the potential to be a winning move.
Meg Pritchard, the principal of CREATE: Communications—Media—Marketing, is a lawyer, writer and marketing professional who works with law firms and lawyers to develop compelling content for their marketing and business development. She can be reached at [email protected] or 215-514-3206.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Orrick Loses 10-Lawyer Team to Herbert Smith in Germany
- 2‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Legal Arm of the Big Four Firm Entering the US
- 3Justice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
- 4McDermott Continues UK Growth With Another Partner Hire in London
- 52 Texas Lawyers Vie for Prominent Post: 2025-2026 Election
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250