Home Delivery Services—Restaurant Disruption or Destruction?
Do you order items from Amazon? If so, you are likely to order food delivery from restaurants. With Amazon merchandise, you will know when the order is fulfilled and a likely date and part of day when it will be delivered.
August 22, 2019 at 12:45 PM
6 minute read
Do you order items from Amazon? If so, you are likely to order food delivery from restaurants. With Amazon merchandise, you will know when the order is fulfilled and a likely date and part of day when it will be delivered. With delivery services from restaurants, you can expect not only order tracking but delivery times to the quarter hour. Is this a disruption or will it be the destruction of the restaurant business?
|Home Delivery as Destruction
Many restaurants need to offer home delivery to compete. They find that they need to associate with DoorDash, Uber Eats and the like, for mobile delivery and loyalty. The average commission rate that private restaurant chains pay third-party providers of digital ordering and delivery is 25%. That means that third-party transactions need margins of roughly 45% in order to be profitable. In the alternative, you could sell a lot more food at very low margins.
Privately owned restaurants are at a disadvantage when negotiating the commission rate. Because of bargaining power and geographic scope, large chains, and particularly franchise restaurant chains, are able to negotiate commission rates down to 15%. Still, that is a hefty expense for any restaurant. An independent restaurant chain without a fully integrated point of sale system may pay 35% for the digital platform and delivery. Franchised restaurants almost always have a point of sale system for digital ordering. Your royalty payments at work. So franchised and large chain restaurants dealing with third-party providers will save about 50% of the commission costs imposed by the third-party delivery provider.
Uber Eats works with restaurants in two ways: It processes orders for restaurants that manage their own delivery; it can also manage orders and provide delivery for restaurants that require both services. Uber Eats charges as high as 35% in commission for every order that is calculated as a percentage of sales. The platform offers two pieces of software to restaurant partners—the Restaurant Dashboard, which runs on a tablet in the restaurant, and Restaurant Manager, a web-based tool for restaurant managers to view analytics. The delivery platform promotes the restaurant's menu on its app and website. Once an order is received, a delivery partner picks up the meal and delivers it.
Most restaurants operate on already thin margins of around 10% to 20%. By paying per-order commission fees for customers and repeat customers, they soon realize how hard it is to build long-run, sustainable growth for their restaurants. Some find that as third-party delivery increases, profitability decreases.
|Home Delivery as Disrupter
Third-party delivery providers are simply restaurant aggregators for ordering and delivery systems. Brands are finding ways of increasing margins without increasing volume. The future is the millennials and Generation Z. They may not care for in-house dining, full service hospitality or taking a ride in a car to pick up food. They may not mind re-heating lukewarm food deliveries and might prefer the convenience of ordering through Alexa or Siri. Delivery of dinner is competing with the daily home-cooked meal for dinner, and this trend is continuing. As third-party delivery digital ordering and delivery systems grow, consumers will grow with the convenience and the market for home delivery is expected to grow exponentially.
|What Is the Future?
As the third-party delivery systems aggregate more restaurants, their costs per delivery will drop and their bite out of the margins should fall. This would benefit both the restaurant which can realize better margins, as well as the consumer, who is being asked—more and more—to absorb some of the delivery costs through the pricing of the product.
But will restaurants reach a saturation point with third-party providers? Digital ordering should become as easy for restaurant owners to apply as Quicken© and Quickbooks© simplified business accounting. High-margin beverages, soft drinks as well as alcohol, are generally not being ordered for delivery. Expect restaurants to shift from high-profit, full-service dining to low-profit delivered meals. Retail real estate will be shifting from high-rental, consumer-facing sit-down restaurants to lower rental commissaries in industrial areas that deliver food to population centers quickly and efficiently. Expect real estate to be combined for both uses, with commissaries attached to dining locations, or restaurants going more "industrial" to satisfy the need for commissary space.
The third-party delivery companies themselves will be subjecting themselves to increasing pressure to decrease their commissions. They will need to re-invest in their digital platforms and their interfaces with the restaurant-ordering systems. They will have problems with finding labor and complying with increasingly complicated employment laws. Third-party delivery companies must compete for additional market share and the restaurants are simultaneously asking for lower fees. The growth and stability of these third-party providers may be a determinant of the future.
Will restaurant chains form their own digital ordering and delivery systems, or pay for someone else to do it? Will restaurant concepts downsize full service facilities to survive the margin erosion from customer-delivery demands?
Developing algorithms to calculate delivery coverage and times, and the digitizing of ordering is not the mainstream business of most restaurants, including chains and franchise systems. Instead, third-party providers has become its own booming business. It is a business of aggregating different restaurants and finding drivers. It is a business of refining the software. It is a business of using delivery data properly and ethically. As John Hamburger of Franchise Times quips, "Third-party delivery companies are building their own brands, ominously for those restaurant operators sitting on their hands." That is the future of restaurant operation, and whether it will be the disruption or destruction of each individual brand remains to be seen.
Craig R. Tractenberg is a partner and co-chair of the franchise and distribution practice group at Fox Rothschild where he handles complex business disputes involving intellectual property, licenses, business torts and insolvency issues. He focuses his practice on franchise companies' development and expansion. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDelivery Driver's Slip-and-Fall Suit Slides Forward Against Equipment Rental Company
4 minute readFederal Judge Sides With FedEx in Arbitration Dispute Over 'Transportation Worker' Definition
5 minute readCBD or Not to Be? Pa. Liquor Licensees and CBD Regulations
'Profits Over the Well-being of Americans': Feds Sue AmerisourceBergen Over Opioid Crisis
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250