Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 201, the court was permitted to take judicial notice of executive orders issued by U.S President Donald Trump and public statements by both President Trump and the U.S. Attorney regarding their efforts to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities such as the City of Philadelphia. The court rendered an evidentiary ruling, taking judicial notice of the proffered statements.
Decedents daughter had probable cause to file this will contest where decedent abruptly changed her estate documents and substituted the agent under her existing a power of attorney during a period in which she suffered from several serious ailments, including paranoia caused by strokes. The court recommended affirmance of its order denying appellants motion to enforce a forfeiture clause.
Addressing an issue of first impression, the appellate court held that the intervening parties right of first refusal did not survive a foreclosure action since it was not a covenant that ran with the land and bound everyone in the future to the same contract. The appellate court reversed in part and affirmed in part.
District court erred in dismissing for lack of diversity jurisdiction because Americold Realty Trust v. Conagra Foods, Inc. 136 S.Ct. 1012, ab-rogated Emerald Investors Trust v. Gaunt Parsippany Partners, 492 F.3d 192, and held that the citizenship of a traditional trust was based solely on the citizenship of its trustee and that of a business trust was that of its constituent owners and the court remanded since appellant comprised five trusts and the record contained only one trust instrument. Vacated.
The trial court properly found that opposing counsels acquiescence to the claimed attorney fees was not dispositive of a fair and reasonable amount and, thus, considered counsels testimony that his representation of plaintiff was totally separate and unconnected to his work at his former intellectual property law firm. The appellate court affirmed the trial courts order granting attorney fees.
Plaintiff adequately alleged negligence, breach of fiduciary duty and punitive damages claims against a nursing home related to the understaffing of the facility. The court denied defendants preliminary objections.
Defendant voluntarily consented to a chemical blood test, and he did not have a constitutional right to speak to an attorney before deciding whether to consent to the blood draw. The court denied his motion to suppress.
The evidence in the negligence case involving the understaffing of a rehabilitation facility supported the jurys award of compensatory and punitive damages. The court denied defendants motions for post-trial relief.
Publication Date: 2018-05-08 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Platt Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0529
Even assuming defendant did not waive his claim that the trial court erred in granting the commonwealths motion to preclude repeated references to him as an innocent man during voir dire, the claim failed since the trial courts decision did not undermine his presumption of innocence. The appellate court affirmed defendants judgment of sentence.