Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Defendant was not entitled to a judgment of non pros or an order enjoining enforcement of a judgment where the plaintiff properly obtained its default judgment and acted with reasonable promptitude in enforcing that judgment.
Zoning board did not abuse its discretion in rejecting a request for a use variance where the applicant failed to establish the existence of an unnecessary hardship.
The court granted defendants motion to suppress where the law enforcement officer who stopped the vehicle in which defendant was riding did not have reasonable suspicion that the driver committed any traffic violation.
Superior Court erred in affirming the Orphans Courts decree that under 20 Pa. C.S. §7710.2, decedents inter vivos trust had to be considered part of the pretermitted spousal share because nothing in the text of §7710.2 or the commentary thereto expressed any specific legislative intent to change the pre-2006 framework for providing for pretermitted spouses and the language in §7710.2 was consistent with prior precedent. Reversed.
Publication Date: 2018-01-16 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Moulton Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0026
Trial court erred in denying appellants motion to suppress evidence of a gun because when police responded to an anonymous tip about a man on a bus with a gun, officer lacked reasonable suspicion to take appellant off bus and frisk him since officer had no support for the tipsters assertion. Judgment vacated.
Contingent beneficiary lacked standing to force trustee to make trust assets productive, where trust agreement conferred such standing exclusively upon the trusts current beneficiary, and where contingent beneficiary could not access trust property through current beneficiary as a creditor due to trust agreements spendthrift provision. Order of the orphans court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2018-01-16 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Supreme Court Judge:Justice Wecht Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0016
The trial court properly granted defendant a new trial where the commonwealth failed to disclose five police reports which suggested that the commonwealths key witness sought to curry favor with police regarding his own criminal conduct by testifying against defendant. The high court affirmed an order granting defendant a new trial.
Trial court erred in finding that a summer house was a permitted use that did not require a development right and that appellees had a vested right in not having a development right attached to the summer house because based on the record, it was not possible to determine if the summer house constituted a tenant dwelling and it was not clear whether the township knew of the exact use to which the summer house was put. Vacated and remanded.
Publication Date: 2018-01-16 Practice Area:Criminal Law | Evidence Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Ott Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0013
The evidence produced at trial was sufficient for the jury to reasonably infer that defendant constructive possession of the drugs and drug paraphernalia found in a vehicle driven by another individual given his suspicious behavior and the location of the contraband within defendants immediate reach. The appellate court affirmed defendants judgment of sentence.
Shareholders agreements inclusion of mandatory adjustments to valuation of employee share redemption price did not preclude application of accounting industry standard adjustments and discounts. Judgment affirmed.