Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Publication Date: 2024-04-05 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Supreme Court Judge:Justice Donohue Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 8 EAP 2023
Juveniles adjudicated delinquent and ordered to out-of-home placement could seek expedited review of their placement as of right, with the superior court not having the discretion to deny review. Order of the superior court reversed.
Plaintiff and defendants filed cross-motions for summary judgment in plaintiff's action alleging violations of a software license agreement. In pertinent part, the court held the plaintiff had no claim for breach of the license agreement's restriction against unauthorized distribution of confidential software where, even if defendants breached the provision, plaintiff offered no evidence of resulting damages.
Police officer was not entitled to qualified immunity where he misrepresented the strength of the sole eyewitness identification and omitted other exculpatory facts, thereby undermining the magistrate's finding of probable cause and violating the arrested individual's clearly established rights. Order of the district court affirmed.
Petitioners sought mandamus to prevent the disclosure of documents the district court ordered released under the fraud exception to the attorney client privilege and court found petitioners failed to show a clear and indisputable abuse of discretion or error of law, a lack of an alternate avenue for adequate relief or a likelihood of irreparable injury. Motion denied.
Plaintiff filed an unopposed motion for final approval of a class action settlement and related matters. The court granted the motion where the settlement amount was reasonable in light of plaintiff's novel theory of recovery, which presented an issue of first impression on calculation of overtime compensation under the Minimum Wage Act, and all other class action criteria were satisfied.
Court declined to dismiss illegal search and seizure claim where district attorney's office memo could not authorize a search of a commercial establishment and the memo's threat to shut down the store meant that the employees'/managers' consent to the search and seizure was not voluntary. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings denied in part and granted in part.