Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
280 results for '* topic:"Contracts"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-05-02
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Hodge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0375
The court lacked authority to modify a consent order entered into by agreement of the parties where defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into that consent order, and that order's validity did not hinge upon the status of the parties' separate and underlying agreement. The court denied defendant's petition to modify a consent order.
Publication Date: 2022-04-25
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Health Care | Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Chester County
Judge: Judge Griffith
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0373
Plaintiff rightfully sought to enforce an asset acquisition agreement and compel specific performance upon defendants' unjustified termination of that agreement, and also established each of the prerequisites to qualify for a preliminary injunction, including that greater injury would result to the company from refusing an injunction than from granting it. The court granted plaintiff's petition for a preliminary injunction.
Publication Date: 2022-04-18
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Education
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Schulman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0294
Plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on his claim for the advancement of legal fees against his former employer, Temple University, where the unambiguous contract the school drafted vis--vis university by-laws mandated indemnification, including the advancement of legal fees, for school representatives. The court recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2022-04-18
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Construction
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Jones
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0430
Marital status could be protected class for Fair Housing Act discrimination claim where plaintiffs were allegedly discriminated against both for being single as well as being women. Defendants' motion to dismiss denied in part and granted in part.
Publication Date: 2022-04-04
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0322
The evidence at bar established a binding contract between the parties where their email exchanges demonstrated an offer by plaintiff and acceptance by defendant such that judgment would be entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant on a $100,000 loan with interest based on a renegotiated promissory note. The court found in favor of plaintiff.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Janet K. Colaneri
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2022-03-28
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0232
By pursuing a breach of partnership contract claim at trial, plaintiff waived his post-trial claim to recover damages under the parties' novation, especially after arguing against the existence of the novation during trial.
Publication Date: 2022-03-14
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Williamson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0176
Plaintiff demonstrated the probable validity of his claim to rightful ownership of a dog he shared with an ex-girlfriend, who left the shared residence to enter an in-patient rehabilitation program and who also agreed by text message that plaintiff would retain their two dogs. The court granted plaintiff's request for a writ of replevin pending the final outcome of the lawsuit.
Publication Date: 2022-03-14
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Construction
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stabile
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0281
Where parties' construction contract was found invalid due to failure to comply with statutory requirements, trial court erred in evaluating contractor's evidence of loss under the damages standard for an unjust enrichment claim rather than the proper standard of a quantum meruit claim. Judgment of the trial court reversed, case remanded.
Publication Date: 2022-03-14
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Kearney
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0287
Factual dispute over which documents made up the parties' contractual agreement precluded dismissal of the action at the pleadings stage. Defendant's motion to dismiss denied.
Publication Date: 2022-02-28
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Motto
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0121
The court held that it was bound to accept all factual averments in respondent's answer as having been admitted because of the application of Pa.R.C.P. 206.7 and petitioner's failure to conduct discovery. Motion denied.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read