Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
101 results for '* topic:"Damages"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2023-08-21
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Commonwealth Court, Chester County
Judge: Judge Binder
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2020-08163-TT
Defendants moved to transfer plaintiff's suit to compulsory arbitration on the ground that the amount in controversy was not greater than $50,000. The court denied defendants' motion.
Publication Date: 2023-07-31
Practice Area: Damages
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Sullivan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1006 EDA 2022
Party who broke off engagement was not required to return engagement jewelry because party who proposed marriage was still in a valid marriage at all times during the parties' dating relationship and engagement, making the engagement void ab initio and rendering the gift an unconditional gift. Judgment of the trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-07-24
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Aubre Dean, Kevin A. Meehan, Juan O. Perla, Joseph D. Pizzurro, and Allesandra D. Tyler, Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle, New York, NY for appellant.
for defendant: Jonathan M. Albano, Christopher L. Carter, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Boston, MA; Jody C. Barillare, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Wilmington, DE; James D. Nelson, David B. Salmons, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Washington, DC; Laura D. Jones, Peter J. Keane, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, Wilmington, DE; Robert H. Poole, II, Alston & Bird, Atlanta, GA; Rajat Rana, Alexander A. Yanos, Alston & Bird, New York, NY; Joshua S. Bolian, Riley & Jacobson, Nashville, TN; Marie McManus Degnan, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; James E. Berger, DLA Piper, New York, NY; R. Craig Martin, DLA Piper, Wilmington, DE; Katherine G. Connolly, Norton Rose Fulbright, Los Angeles, CA; Matthew H. Kirtland, Norton Rose Fulbright, Washington, DC; Kevin J. Mangan, Stephanie S. Riley, Matthew P. Ward, Womble Bond Dickinson, Wilmington, DE; Ginger D. Anders, Kathleen A. Foley, Elaine J. Goldenberg, Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Sarah Weiner, Munger Tolles & Olson, Washington, DC for appellees.
Case Number: 23-1647
Despite Venezuela's opposition leader being recognized by the U.S. as the legitimate leader of the Venezuelan government, the continued exercise of extensive control by the opposition leader and his rival over Venezuela's national oil company meant the company continued as the alter ego of Venezuela and its assets remained subject to attachment to satisfy Venezuela's judgment debts.
Publication Date: 2023-04-10
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Dumas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1422 C.D. 2021
Trial court erred in denying city's motion for JNOV and its challenge to the derivative damage award in plaintiffs' action for trespass, private nuisance, negligence and violations of the Stormwater Management Act because derivative damages for "past, present and future loss of enjoyment of their property" as well as "annoyance and inconvenience" were not permitted. Vacated and remanded.
Publication Date: 2023-03-27
Practice Area: Damages
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Street
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 00124
The court denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration following a jury verdict in her favor. Although plaintiff argued that the award was not supported by her demonstration of chronic pain, medical bills, and loss of income, the court disagreed and noted that plaintiff had every opportunity to prove up her damages claims during trial but failed to adequately present her case.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schmehl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-4983
Pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C., plaintiffs could not recover compensatory damages for emotional distress based on claims brought under Title IX of the Education Amendments, §504 of the Rehabilitation Act and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The court granted in part defendant's motion for summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2023-02-20
Practice Area: Damages
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Williamson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 6242 CIVIL 2020
The court opined, based on standards set forth in 2021's Spencer v. Johnson, that the superior court would rule that joint and several liability applied to all defendants, without the limitations of the Fair Share Act, unless the plaintiff had some amount of contributory negligence. The court awarded plaintiff $345,866 in damages.
Publication Date: 2022-11-07
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Federal Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Haines
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1:20-2-2
Government sought restitution after defendant pled guilty to conspiracy to defraud the U.S. by committing food stamp fraud and court found government could not show the Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service suffered any monetary loss as a direct result of defendant's conduct because the benefits would have been paid out regardless of defendant's fraudulent actions. Motion denied.
Publication Date: 2022-10-31
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Judge: Judge Nealon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22 CV 1361
The court granted a motion to strike a lis pendens on the grounds that plaintiff simply sought punitive and compensatory damages and the relief sought did not arise out of allegations concerning the land at issue. Therefore, because plaintiff did not advance any claim in her pleadings regarding any right, title, or interest in the properties, the court granted defendant's motion to strike.
Publication Date: 2022-10-24
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Hill
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2436 EDA 2021
Court found against defendants, who raised a statement of matters complained of on appeal challenging the trial court's orders and jury's verdict arising out of a trial for damages stemming from a home repair contract between the parties. Although defendant argued that the court erred in various aspects regarding expert witnesses, the court held that these were harmless errors which did not prevent defendant from presenting their case to the jury.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read