• Commonwealth v. Arias

    Publication Date: 2022-12-19
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stevens
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 543 MDA 2022

    Multiple factors, including odor of marijuana, attempts to conceal identity and ownership of vehicle, and noncooperation during traffic stop, gave police probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of defendant's vehicle. Judgment of sentence affirmed.

  • United States v. Womack

    Publication Date: 2022-12-12
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Restrepo
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 16-1682

    Appellants appealed their convictions and sentence for conspiracy to distribute CDS, CDS distribution and weapons charges arguing improper evidence rulings, jury instructions and sentencing and court found district court's rulings were error-free. Affirmed.

  • United States v. Dyer

    Publication Date: 2022-12-12
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Rendell
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-3087

    Defendant, who pled guilty after his suppression motion was denied, appealed his conviction on being a felon in possession of a firearm and court found the box containing pills, whose seizure he argued was improper, did not support the charges against him in any meaningful way, could have had no effect on his decision to plead guilty and district court's error in admitting the box was harmless. Affirmed.

  • In the Interest of T.Q.B.

    Publication Date: 2022-11-28
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge McCaffery
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1527 MDA 2021

    Appellant juvenile appealed her delinquency adjudication for cyber harassment of a child and transmission of sexually explicit images by a minor after appellant goaded mentally challenged juvenile to lift her shirt and expose the bottom of her breasts on Instagram Live and court rejected appellant's argument that nudity under 18 Pa.C.S. §6321 required a fully exposed breast and found appellant's course of conduct was intended to harass victim. Affirmed.

  • Commonwealth v. Dunkowski

    Publication Date: 2022-11-14
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
    Judge: Judge Bateman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: CP-09-0000248-2020

    The court sentenced defendant to a term of imprisonment outside her sentencing guidelines where the child neglect at issue, involving young victims who were lucky to be alive, was described by a treating physician as the worst case of neglect he had ever seen. The court recommended affirmance.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Georgia Construction Law Handbook 2024

    Authors: T. BART GARY, JAKE CARROLL

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Commonwealth v. Littler

    Publication Date: 2022-11-07
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
    Judge: Judge Cox
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 92 OF 2021, S.A.

    Court overturned trial court finding that a street musician had violated the New Wilmington Borough Local Ordinance §100-2 by singing alone on the street corner. The court reviewed the specific language of the statute and concluded that defendant was not assembling a group of people. Therefore, the court found for defendant due to the statute's clear and unambiguous language.

  • United States v. Haisten

    Publication Date: 2022-10-24
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry: Legal Services
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Jordan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1421

    District court erred in denying appellants' 28 U.S.C. §2255 motion asserting ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to challenge venue for two of the counts on which they were convicted and court found appellants had a colorable claim for ineffective assistance of counsel and district court abused its discretion in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing. Vacated and remanded.

  • Kennedy v. Superintendent Dallas SCI

    Publication Date: 2022-10-24
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Stearns
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1265

    Petitioner appealed the denial of his habeas petition arguing his speedy trial rights were violated and court found the first Barker factor weighed against the commonwealth, since a 50-month delay was exceptional, as did the second and fourth factors. Reversed.

  • United States v. Fallon

    Publication Date: 2022-10-17
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry: Federal Government | Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Fuentes
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-2775

    Defendants appealed their conviction for wire fraud, mail fraud, conspiracy to launder money and theft of government property in case involving the return of unused pharmaceuticals and court vacated defendants' convictions for conspiracy to launder money but affirmed the other convictions. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

  • Commonwealth v. Bieber

    Publication Date: 2022-10-10
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Bender
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1630 MDA 2021

    Defendant was entitled to a new trial on charges that he violated 18 Pa.C.S. §6106(a) by carrying a firearm without a license where the trial court erred in allowing the jury to hear inadmissible and irrelevant legal opinion testimony from a sheriff which could have contributed to the guilty verdict. The appellate court vacated defendant's judgment of sentence and remanded for a new trial.