Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Appellants Keydotta and Aldric Crawford, on behalf of K.C., appealed the district court's grant of emergency relief to the Trenton Public School District Board of Education, which vacated an administrative law judge's order of emergent relief.
Appellant Ronald Saintil appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment to defendants on his federal and state law claims arising from his arrest and the search of his property.
Publication Date: 2024-07-26 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Sullivan Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 140 EDA 2023
Trial court erred in finding insufficient evidence to establish mens rea for third-degree murder based on a "single punch," given the victim's incapacitation due to alcohol intoxication and defendant's unprovoked punch, failure to render aid, and attempt to cover up the facts. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.
Defendant employer moved to dismiss a male employee's claims of sex discrimination arising out of his alleged inappropriate text messages to female colleagues. The court granted the motion to dismiss, holding that certain of plaintiff's claims were time-barred or subject to dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and that his remaining claim failed where plaintiff alleged nothing more than that defendant placed him under "a cloud of suspicion" because he was male.
Publication Date: 2024-07-26 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Lazarus Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 30 WDM 2024
Court of Common Pleas did not abuse discretion in revoking bail based on information about the alleged offenses that indicated defendant's mental health status made him a threat to public safety. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Appellants appealed the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of appellees and dismissing with prejudice appellants' action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. The court affirmed, holding that appellant's suit was barred on grounds of collateral estoppel where their argument that township had abandoned the public purpose for which it had condemned land had been fully and fairly litigated in earlier proceedings.
Appellant appealed the court's order denying his petition to adopt an adult son. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed where the parties demonstrated no good cause for proceeding with the adoption absent a relinquishment of parental rights by adoptee's father.