Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Appellant appealed the district court's orders dismissing various claims, denying his motion to amend his complaint, and granting summary judgment in favor of Capital One Bank USA N.A.
ERISA retirement plan participants adequately alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by plausibly alleging that the plan was charged excessive recordkeeping fees based on data showing rates charges to other plans and the fact that the plan switched to a lower-cost provider with no change in the kind or quality of services. Order of the district court vacated and remanded.
Department of Education improperly promulgated new age-out rules under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act by failing to follow mandatory rulemaking procedures as the rules had the force of law and materially affected school districts' budgeting. Petitioners' application granted, respondents' cross-application denied.
Plaintiff sought review of defendant's denial of his claim for child disability benefits and supplemental security income. The court granted defendant's uncontested motion for remand after concluding an administrative law judge failed to properly evaluate the opinion of plaintiff's treating psychiatrist regarding plaintiff's mental disability.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Commonwealth Court Judge:Judge Cannon Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 47 M.D. 2021
Respondent applied for summary relief denying petitioner's petition for removal from Pennsylvania's sex offender registry. The court granted respondent's application for summary relief, holding that petitioner, who was incarcerated and became subject to Megan's Law II upon its effective date in 2000, was required as a matter of law to register as a sex offender for his lifetime.
The court affirmed the district court's denial of appellant's motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of his arrest for possessing, receiving, and making child pornography and traveling in interstate commerce with the intent to have sexual contact with a minor.
Plaintiffs appealed the court's entry of summary judgment dismissing their claim for declaratory relief in their wrongful death and survival action alleging medical malpractice against certain medical providers after the death of their son. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed where plaintiffs' settlement of their tort claim for corporate negligence based on a hospital's allegedly improper delegation of the duty of oversight meant they no longer had standing to seek a judicial declaration that the underlying professio
Plaintiffs sought certification of a damages class and multiple issue classes in their putative class action alleging abuse and related claims arising during their residence at a private residential rehabilitative institution. The court in pertinent part denied certification of a damages class where plaintiffs failed to demonstrate requisite commonality and typicality among putative class members, who were over one thousand former residents of the institution who allegedly suffered individual forms of abuse during their time at the fa
The court defended its order denying plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's jury demand asserting that the appeal is an impermissible interlocutory appeal, and the decision was within the trial court's discretion.