Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
A nonprofit organization was entitled to an exemption from real property taxes where it qualified as a pure public charity and was the equitable owner of the subject property.
Trial court's factual findings were supported by the record in case brought over water leakage and renovations in a basement that sellers had not disclosed on the property disclosure form and, while sellers had a duty to disclose the renovations on the form and they did not do so, inspection company failed to show that buyers suffered actual damage as result of the failure to disclose. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2018-09-18 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Nichols Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-1057
The trial court did not err in concluding that it could not impose liability under Chapter 26 of the Crimes Code, i.e., the Crimes Against the Unborn Child Act, upon a pregnant woman regarding alleged crimes against her unborn child. The appellate court affirmed an order dismissing an aggravated assault charge against defendant.
Pursuant to the state high court's 2017 decision in Commonwealth v. Muniz, the trial courts could not impose retroactively upon defendants the increased registration requirements in the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, regardless of whether defendants accepted plea bargains or were convicted at trial. The appellate court reversed trial court orders imposing increased sexual offender registration requirements.
Plaintiff could not maintain claims under Pennsylvania's Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection against the defendant optical service providers because the UTPCPL does not apply to providers of medical services. The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment.
District court correctly denied appellant's motion to dismiss appellees' breach of contract action over an alleged overcharge of a commission for trading stock because the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act did not bar the action since under Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice, 571 U.S. 377 and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit, 547 U.S. 71. The overcharges did not have a "connection that matter[ed]" to the securities transactions at issue. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2018-09-18 Practice Area:Evidence Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Olson Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-1100
The trial court erred in excluding evidence of an alleged victim's prior sexual conduct where defendant sought to admit such evidence to attack the victim's credibility and establish a plausible motive for her accusations, not to portray her as promiscuous. The appellate court vacated defendant's judgment of sentence and remanded.
Plaintiff's claims against the City of Philadelphia for injuries allegedly suffered due to the negligence of a city ambulance operator were barred by Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act since the motor vehicle exception to sovereign immunity did not apply in this case, where plaintiff fell from a gurney after the ambulance was parked. The court recommended affirmance of its order sustaining the City's preliminary objections.
Publication Date: 2018-09-18 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Lazarus Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-1107
Trial court erred in finding indirect criminal contempt for violation of visitation order where parent was not afforded procedural safeguards and where trial court imposed sentence of incarceration rather than fine. Order of the trial court vacated.
Mother demonstrated that a proposed move to Missouri to seize on an opportunity to own a working cattle farm was in her minor child's best interests but failed to demonstrate that it was necessary to move immediately. The court granted mother's petition to relocate but delayed the move until the school year's end.