Superior Court Tosses Pilot's $2.5M Wrongful Termination Verdict
“If it became the law that an employee may bring a wrongful discharge claim pursuant to the public policy exception to the at will employment doctrine merely by referring to generalized pronouncements about community interests offered by the General Assembly, the exception would soon swallow the rule,” the court ruled.Is Professional Development for Partners the Missing Link to Talent Retention?
Gallup studies attribute most variability in engagement to “middle managers.” Within law firms, this suggests partners may hold the key to transforming their firms into sought-after opportunities with staying power.Franchisees Benefit From Subchapter V Bankruptcy Option
When franchisees choose to financially reorganize under the Bankruptcy Code, they may be the right size to choose to reorganize under subchapter V of Chapter 11. Subchapter V proceedings are simpler, more streamlined and less expensive than a traditional Chapter 11 and is ideal to allow the self-employed to revitalize their small business. Where the franchisor and the franchisee cannot reconcile, subchapter V may provide the franchisee with breathing room and leverage to be revitalized.People in the News—Nov. 19, 2024—Pond Lehocky, Duane Morris
Pond Lehocky Giordano announced the addition of Mariah Rivera—a workers’ compensation lawyer—to the firm's legal team.Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
In The Legal's Products Liabilty, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury special section, read about the product-line exception in Pennsylvania, dangerous dietary supplement cases, and the intersection of personal injury and family law.The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
The balance of power has shifted so heavily toward corporate interests and internet commerce that, with a decentralized supply chain, consumer protections against dangerous products are now considerably weakened. Civil litigation in a court of law is the best way consumers can hold the sellers of dangerous products accountable and keep us all safe.The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
The Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision in Spencer v. Johnson and its “alternative” holding cast uncertainty around the commonwealth’s Fair Share Act’s application to all tort actions and the apportionment of damages among multiple tortfeasors. Subsequent judicial decisions and proposed legislative changes create a complex landscape for legal practitioners, plaintiffs and defendants alike.A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
Imagine as a product manufacturer being held liable for defects in a product that you did not make, have never made, and have no plans to make. This very real possibility exists in Pennsylvania under what is commonly referred to as “the product-liability exception” to the general rule of successor nonliability. Although it has been around for close to 50 years, the exception is not well-developed in Pennsylvania.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250