Silicon Valley GCs Increasingly Named Executive Officers, Report Says
"People want to be part of an operation that's highly regarded, to be among the executive team, and to be a part of the decision-making for the entire entity," one expert said.
December 22, 2017 at 12:25 PM
3 minute read
Shutterstock.com
Good news for general counsel and corporate legal officers—top in-house legal leaders are now executive officers at many of Silicon Valley's biggest companies.
Fenwick & West's 2017 Corporate Governance Survey recently found that 71.4 percent of SV 150 companies, a grouping of the largest public Silicon Valley companies by revenue, identified a GC, CLO or other senior legal executive as an executive officer. While there's still a long way to go—95 percent of S&P 100 companies have in-house lawyers as executive officers— that's a much higher percentage than just a few years ago.
In 2006, just over 50 percent of Silicon Valley companies reported a GC or CLO as an executive officer. In early 2000, that percentage was under 30.
“Ten or 15 years ago, GCs [in Silicon Valley] were just outliers,” said Dave Bell, a partner at Fenwick who works with companies in the region. He said peer review groups from Fenwick used to ask about GCs and hear there wasn't ample data because there were so few in California's tech industry.
But now, he said, “we don't hear that anymore.”
Silicon Valley's demand for involved, business-savvy GCs is on the rise, with a growth rate faster than nationwide S&P 100 counterparts. While S&P companies tend to be in more established industries, tech companies are often entering uncharted—and less regulated—industries. Experts say this means that the legal function, and its leaders, are ever more important and are getting elevated to executive status.
“Companies are increasingly asking us to find problem-solvers, creative business-minded thinkers, not just people who are very good at saying no,” said Carol Simon, the managing director for legal recruiting firm Major, Lindsey & Africa. “The descriptions that come up are for someone participating in business decisions, [being a] strategic adviser, right-hand person, adviser, consigliere.”
And those are positions that lawyers in Silicon Valley are more eager to fill, Simon says. Potential recruits she's spoken to are looking for a role in which they're treated as an equal, and as an important part of the company. In-house counsel in Silicon Valley, she noted, are looking to be business partners, not people relegated to an office and only called on to say “no” to things.
Instead, she says, candidates and clients want in-house lawyers in tech to figure out how to turn that legal department “no” into a “yes” via new, creative ways of doing business.
“Attorneys are being specific in saying they're not interested in a GC role unless it's at a company where they have a seat at the table,” Simon said. “People want to be part of an operation that's highly regarded, to be among the executive team, and to be a part of the decision-making for the entire entity.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250