Santa Clara Law's New Campus Channels Silicon Valley
Charney Hall is designed to be more comfortable for students and flexible enough to respond to the changing ways that law is taught.
March 14, 2018 at 04:44 PM
4 minute read
Faculty at the Santa Clara University School of Law are getting a major upgrade this week as they move into the school's new $60 million campus, dubbed Charney Hall.
The 96,000-square-foot building is a vast improvement over the school's existing facilities, which are spread over five different buildings, one of which was built a century ago. In contrast, Charney Hall calls to mind the nearby Silicon Valley tech campuses thanks to copious amounts of open space, natural light, cutting-edge classroom technology, plenty of student comforts, and flexible spaces that foster collaboration and innovative teaching.
Students won't start taking regular classes in the new facility until the fall, but those who have been popping in over spring break for early looks have been impressed, according to law Dean Lisa Kloppenberg. (The school plans to offer its bar review course in the new building, as well as hold several events for those on the cusp of graduation.)
“This is one comprehensive facility designed for law,” she said. “We have beautiful clinic space and we have study space throughout the building. It was designed with students as the focal point.”
The new campus boasts a first-floor coffee bar, light-filled atrium, numerous indoor and outdoor gathering places, a wellness room for nursing mothers and students with medical needs, and a meditation space that can be used by Muslim students to pray or by others looking to calm their nerves before an exam. Additionally, the building's planning committee opted against a faculty lounge, instead designing a lounge where students and faculty can dine together in hopes of fostering more interaction and mentoring opportunities, Kloppenberg said.
Planners also tried to envision how law will be taught for the next 50 years. Classrooms are wired with cameras and screens, but are also designed to accommodate different styles of teaching. One classroom, dubbed the “lawyers lab” features eight screens and flexible furniture that will allow small groups to collaborate. The school plans to use the room for conflict resolution programs as well as classes that incorporate law, business and engineering. Another room is set up to enable teleconferencing. Instead of a huge library with endless stacks of books, the library in Charney Hall is smaller, with a focus on digital materials and student study space.
Kloppenberg said she is hopeful that the new facility will help Santa Clara's recruiting, though the school has no plans to increase enrollment. (The student body and faculty have shrunk by more than a third since Kloppenberg became dean in 2013.)
“We do think this will strengthen recruiting,” she said. “It's clearly designed to welcome the law student in, and I hope it will make a big difference.”
University officials approached Kloppenberg with a proposition soon after she joined the school: They wanted to build a new center for science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) programs at the center of campus, where the law school's outdated main building now stands. In exchange for clearing out, the university would build the law school a new home, provided it raised $25 million. The university paid the remaining $35 million cost. It sounded like a great deal to Kloppenberg.
“The students will never pay a dime on it,” she said. “We will not be paying on debt servicing.”
The building is named for Santa Clara trustee and law school alumnus Howard Charney and his wife Alida, who contributed $10 million to the project. Charney is the founder of several Silicon Valley tech companies. He co-founded digital electronics manufacturer 3Com Corp., which later was sold to Hewlett-Packard Co. Charney also co-founded Grand Junction Networks, an internet connectivity company that Cisco bought in 1995.
Kloppenberg said the new building is the first step in a long-term plan to raise the law school's profile.
“We have an ambitious vision of being one of the strongest Jesuit law school in the country—kind of West Coast counterweight to Georgetown and Fordham,” she said. “That will take a while.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
5 minute readHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 2Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 3Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 4Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 5Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250