Squire Patton Boggs Acquires Silicon Valley-Based IP Boutique
For the third time in three years, the global legal giant has absorbed a smaller firm in the Bay Area.
August 13, 2018 at 12:45 AM
5 minute read
Squire Patton Boggs is once again expanding in Northern California.
The firm will announce Monday its acquisition of Singularity, a Redwood City, California-based intellectual property boutique led by partners Frank Bernstein, Vidya Bhakar and Ronald Lemieux.
The three partners, all of whom are well-known legal veterans in Silicon Valley, have joined the global legal giant's office in Palo Alto, California. For Lemieux and Bhakar, it is a homecoming of sorts, as both had previously practiced at Squire Patton Boggs legacy firm Squire Sanders.
“We choose Squire for a couple of reasons. One was familiarity, I was a former partner here,“ said Singularity managing partner Lemieux, who led the Palo Alto-based IP and litigation practice at Squire Sanders from 2000 to 2005, almost a decade before the firm merged with Patton Boggs to form its current iteration. “We have many good friends here, but it is also because Squire is well-situated for exactly what our clients need.”
A majority of the trio's clients are multinational electronic companies, said Lemieux, and as a global full-service firm, Squire Patton Boggs is able to address their clients' other needs, such as cybersecurity, real estate and a wide range of other legal issues.
Lemieux co-founded Singularity with Bhakar in March 2014. Prior to creating the boutique, Lemieux enjoyed a long career in Big Law, having spent nearly four years at Cooley, a firm he joined as a partner in 2010 from Paul Hastings, which hired him in 2005. Before that Lemieux spent almost five years at Squire Sanders, a firm he joined in mid-2000 after its acquisition of his former home, San Francisco-based Graham & James, where he was a partner and member of the latter's firmwide executive committee.
Bernstein joined Singularity in late 2015 after more than a decade at Kenyon & Kenyon, where he served as managing partner of the IP-focused firm's Palo Alto office. (Andrews Kurth absorbed Kenyon & Kenyon the following year, and the combined firm, which merged with Hunton & Williams earlier this year, is now known as Hunton Andrews Kurth.)
Singularly has now wound down its operations due to the departure of its partners to the roughly 1,500-lawyer Squire Patton Boggs, while its other lawyers have gone on to in-house positions, Lemieux said.
“We have been working to expand our IP litigation practice—to provide greater critical mass and to bring in more people who are capable of first-chairing significant IP trial—and we also needed to do that in Silicon Valley,” said David Elkins, leader of Squire Patton Boggs' global intellectual property and technology practice. “Over the last several years, IP litigation has become, if not in greater demand than corporate [work], at least equal.”
Elkins said that Squire Patton Boggs has about 150 lawyers dedicated firmwide to IP work. In the Bay Area, the firm has 15 lawyers in Palo Alto and 70 lawyers in San Francisco.
In a statement, Linda Pfatteicher, managing partner of the San Francisco and Palo Alto offices at Squire Patton Boggs, said the firm looked forward to “working again with our former colleagues Ron and Vid and to welcome Frank. Their commitment to collaboration, cross-selling and a client-and-firm-first attitude match the values and culture that are central to our firm.”
Over the years, Lemieux has served as lead counsel in more than 200 IP cases, trying more than 20 jury and nonjury trials to a final judgment, as well as argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Bernstein, on the other hand, has extensive experience trying cases before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in both pre-grant and post-grant patent matters, as well as substantial U.S. district court experience in all phases of patent litigation proceedings.
Bhakar focuses his practice on IP matters with an emphasis on patents and computer-related technologies. In addition to patent litigation, he has extensive experience in technology transactions and patent prosecution.
The new hires represent a wide range of technology clients. In addition to litigation matters, the trio has substantial experience negotiating technology license agreements, handling trademark transactions and prosecuting patents across several different industries.
The Singularity deal is the third in three years for Squire Patton Boggs in the Bay Area. In February 2016, the firm bolted on Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, a 55-lawyer litigation shop based in San Francisco. That move came nearly a year before Squire Patton Boggs acquired Fernando & Partners, a four-lawyer IP firm based in Palo Alto, although all of those lawyers would subsequently leave the Am Law 100 firm in April.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFaegre Drinker Adds Three Former Federal Prosecutors From Greenberg Traurig
4 minute readAnapol Weiss Acquires Boutique Led by Star Litigator Alexandra Walsh
5 minute readPierson Ferdinand Lures Veteran M&A Specialist From Sheppard Mullin in Silicon Valley
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250