Silicon Valley IP Boutique Quits Squire Patton Boggs a Year Post-Merger
Ronald Fernando, a name partner at Fernando & Partners, has reconstituted his small intellectual property firm after a little more than a year at Squire Patton Boggs.
August 24, 2018 at 12:53 PM
4 minute read
A little more than a year after folding his Palo Alto, California-based intellectual property boutique into Squire Patton Boggs, partner Ronald Fernando has reconstituted his old shop with several current and former colleagues.
The move came quietly a few months before Squire Patton Boggs recently absorbed Singularity, a Redwood City, California-based IP boutique led by partners Frank Bernstein, Vidya Bhakar and Ronald Lemieux. Squire Patton Boggs, formed through a merger in 2014, has been busy expanding in California in recent years. The global legal giant acquired San Francisco-based Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, a 55-lawyer litigation firm, in 2016.
In January 2017, Squire Patton Boggs acquired Fernando & Partners, Fernando's four-lawyer boutique. In a recent interview, Fernando said that his entire team, including former senior associates William “Bill” Higley and Jacob Smith, as well as associate Prateek Bhatnagar, chose to leave Squire Patton Boggs and return to a reborn Fernando & Partners in late April of this year.
“The business relationship didn't work,” said Fernando, a former senior associate at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and associate at Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear. “This is just the reality of any business, sometimes business relationship works out, and sometimes [they don't].”
It was not the first time that business took an unexpected turn for Fernando. In 2013, he co-founded IP-focused boutique Fernando Hale & Chang along with his former Knobbe Martens colleagues Alan Hale and James Chang. After three years, the trio went their separate ways, with Hale and Chang forming Irvine, California-based Chang & Hale, while Fernando created Fernando & Partners. (Higley, a former partner at Fernando Hale & Chang, is now a partner at the revived Fernando & Partners after having been a senior associate at Squire Patton Boggs.)
Fernando said that his firm will continue with its former clients. Over the years, Fernando has worked with clients engaged in a variety of technologies, such as alternative energy, consumer electronics, e-commerce, medical devices, mobile communication systems and software.
In a statement, Squire Patton Boggs said that it and Fernando “decided to pursue separate paths,” and wished him and his colleagues well in the future.
“Movement in and out of large firms, such as ours, is commonplace,” a Squire Patton Boggs spokesman said. “As a general policy, we do not elaborate on individual departures.”
In addition to Fernando and his team, two other litigation and IP veterans have left Squire Patton Boggs' California operations this year for new ventures.
Former patent litigation partner Mark Lupkowski, who spent the past 14 years at Squire Patton Boggs and legacy firm Squire Sanders, has joined the RuyakCherian boutique formed by former Howrey chairman Robert Ruyak, while also operating his own Berkeley, California-based patent prosecution shop called Zhu Lupkowski with RuyakCherian partner Song Zhu. Gregory Morrow, a litigation partner at Squire Patton Boggs for nearly two years in Los Angeles, left the firm in December to become president, CEO and co-founder of a payment services startup called Devizo, also known as Badabing.io, while also running his own solo practice.
As for Squire Patton Boggs, which this summer resolved an IP dispute over its name in China, the global firm has continued to expand elsewhere. In June it launched a public policy practice in China, only a few months after opening an office in Atlanta following a raid on Dentons.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readOpenAI, NYTimes Counsel Quarrel Over Erased OpenAI Training Data
Meta Seeks Declaratory Judgment in VR Eyewear Tech Patent Infringement Case
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250