Should I Quit My Job and Move to Focus on Going In-House in Silicon Valley?
The decision to quit a job and move to a foreign land to find career success takes courage in light of some obvious risks. But these risks are mitigated by a thriving Bay Area legal market and many employers who will appreciate your reasons for such a move.
September 05, 2018 at 12:42 PM
4 minute read
Q: I'm in New York City and have been looking for an in-house job in Silicon Valley for two years. My job demands have made a search difficult. What are the risks/rewards of quitting my job and moving to California to focus solely on my job search?
A: The technology industry dominates the San Francisco Bay Area (which includes Silicon Valley) and is home to the most high-profile companies on earth. It is a mecca that attracts some of the best and the brightest professionals … including lawyers.
Lawyers outside the Bay Area seeking to join the ranks of the techie elite, find their biggest and most common challenge in achieving this goal is … geography. Why? Because the Bay Area has a deep bench of talent. Lawyers with great experience. Lawyers with great credentials. Lawyers with great personalities. It's a high quality candidate pool … and hiring managers know it. Consequently, the vast majority of employers turn to the local market first before considering candidates from other parts of the country … or the state. So regardless of your awesome creds, fantastic experience or winning personality, if you aren't local, you will face an uphill battle in your search effort.
It's a full-time job to look for a job. And not everyone can dedicate the time and effort required to maximize their options. Even if one can manage, the process takes time. Two years of searching without success can be frustrating and demoralizing. So now you're considering a bold move—which is commendable. But is it smart? When assessing the risks … and rewards of a move, you must first understand the in-house market in the geographic region. Below is a summary:
The in-house legal market in the Bay Area is active. Probably more active than any other region in the United States and perhaps the globe. So corporate legal departments are growing in public and private companies. Midlevel senior-level tech and commercial transaction lawyers are in high demand, but areas such as patent, privacy, general corporate, litigation and private GCs are in demand as well. Academic credentials are important, but less than they used to be. Priorities now are the quality of a person's experience and their interpersonal fit. In-house experience is still preferred, but law firm lawyers receive more consideration as the market grows. Multiple moves are the norm in the Bay Area—as are gaps in employment. This is due to the fluidity of the tech industry and the Darwinian nature of the legal profession. Employers are socialized to both. With this said, it's not a place with an unlimited number of mulligans. So candidates still need to choose their moves wisely.
In light of this market information, let's examine the realities of a proposed move:
- By moving to California, you will take one of the biggest objections to your candidacy off the table: your nonlocal status.
- The Bay Area is one of the most active legal markets. So to the extent that you have some marketable skills, in-house employment opportunities will be more robust.
- It's preferred to be employed when seeking another job. But if you've hit a wall after two years of looking, it's not the end of the world. Bay Area employers won't be mortified by an employment gap. If you choose this path, I recommend including your reasons on your resume. This will dispel assumptions that you have been fired.
- If your message regarding your career choices is genuine, succinct and articulate, employers will understand and it won't hurt your candidacy. You'll have one year before the time off will more materially affect your marketability.
- After making the move, finding a new job will still take time. So you'll have to rely on your savings in the interim. The Bay Area is an expensive place so make sure you're financially prepared.
The decision to quit a job and move to a foreign land to find career success takes courage in light of some obvious risks. But these risks are mitigated by a thriving Bay Area legal market and many employers who will appreciate your reasons for such a move and won't penalize you for it. So if this is your dream and you have the family and financial support, then I encourage you to go West, young man, go West.
Julie Q. Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer(www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250