SEC Files Suit Over False Endorsement of ICO
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday unsealed a complaint against cryptocurrency company Blockvest alleging that the company and its founder falsely claimed its initial coin offering had SEC backing.
October 11, 2018 at 02:31 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday unsealed a complaint against a cryptocurrency company and its founder alleging that they falsely claimed its initial coin offering had the backing of the SEC.
The complaint against Blockvest and its founder, Reginald Buddy Ringgold III, was filed on Oct. 3, and on Oct. 5 Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel of the U.S District Court for the Southern District of California signed a temporary restraining order halting pre-ICO sales by Blockvest and Ringgold. The order also freezes Ringgold's and Blockvest's assets. Curiel also ordered that the defendants provide the SEC with a full list of their assets exceeding $5,000.
Blockvest did not immediately respond to request for comment. Ringgold, aka Rasool Abdul Rahim El, according to court documents, also did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Attorneys for Ringgold and Blockvest are not listed.
In the unsealed complaint, the SEC claims that Blockvest and Ringgold claimed their ICO had been registered and approved by the SEC and allegedly used the SEC's logo to promote the offering. The SEC further claims that the defendants made up an entire agency to promote the offering. The agency the defendants allegedly used was called the Blockchain Exchange Commission, or the BEC. The SEC alleges that Ringgold created the BEC and that it is a private business founded in 2015 as Fartlife LLC [sic]. It changed its name to Smartlife LLC in 2017. The company became BEC this past May.
“In reality, defendants have neither the regulatory 'approvals,' nor the established business relationships they claim,” the SEC alleges in the complaint.
In a news release announcing the unsealing of the complaint Robert A. Cohen, chief of the SEC enforcement division, said the defendants made up the relationship with the SEC and even created a fictitious regulatory agency.
“The SEC does not endorse investment products and investors should be highly skeptical of any claims suggesting otherwise,” Cohen said in the release.
The SEC filed claims of fraud in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, fraud in the offer or sale of securities and unregistered offer and sale of securities. The SEC is seeking a court order demanding Ringgold “return ill-gotten gains” including interest and penalties and an order which bars Ringgold from participating in offering any kind of security.
A hearing has been set for Oct. 18 for arguments over whether or not the court should grant a preliminary injunction.
A report published in September by Lex Machina indicates that in 2018 lawsuits over cryptocurrencies have risen. The report indicates that 45 cases had been filed as of September. That number is up from 15 in 2017. The report indicates that the SEC is behind 30 percent of the suits.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readNetflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
2 minute readK&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
3 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250