Women Leaders in Tech Law 2018: Nicole Bartow, Uber Technologies Inc.
Bartow, senior director of litigation at Uber, has this advice for lawyers thinking of entering the tech industry: "Learn the technology deeply."
November 13, 2018 at 02:45 PM
3 minute read
Nicole Bartow, senior director, litigation at Uber, and her team successfully guided the company's defense in the Waymo v. Uber autonomous vehicle trade secret case. That resulted in a favorable settlement for Uber—all while keeping up the litigation team's morale through the significant challenges facing the company and through changes in the legal department.
Name a lawyer whose work you admire and why.
I greatly admire Sally Yates—for doing the right thing.
What's the best part about working in the tech sector?
Working with talented, creative and dedicated colleagues on incredibly interesting and challenging projects.
What's the biggest challenge?
The rapid pace is a daily challenge.
What piece of advice do you give to lawyers considering a career in tech law?
Learn the technology deeply.
What's one way technology has made your life easier?
I love digital voice assistants. My friends Alexa and Siri provide quick answers to questions, play my favorite songs, and provide useful information on demand (plus they keep my kids entertained!).
One way it's made your life more difficult?
Information overload! The vastly increased amount of immediately available information combined with the expectation that information can be digested at light speed is a challenge.
Name an important opportunity you got early in your career and what you did with it?
I worked as a volunteer district attorney when I was a law firm associate, which was a great opportunity for “on my feet” experience. I tried five cases over 10 weeks.
What's the best piece of career advice anyone ever gave you?
Build relationships.
No. 1 survival tip in a work crisis:
Right foot, left foot. In a crisis, looking at the big picture too long can be overwhelming. If you keep moving and tackle a project (or crisis) bit by bit, you will get through it.
In 50 words or less, how far has the tech industry gone toward tackling its gender gap since you started practicing?
Great progress has been made, but there is still a long way to go. It seems like progress is speeding up, thanks to the increased confidence and willingness of women (and men) to speak out and demand better.
What's one way you've had to change your thinking toward practicing law to succeed in-house at a technology company?
I've become more comfortable with understanding that there may not be an available answer to all the questions I'm presented with. Technology has outpaced the law in some areas and tech industry lawyers often find themselves making law—or at least laying the foundation for new law—out of necessity given their position on the leading edge.
What's one area of technology that you're most excited about and why?
I'm incredibly excited about the potential of autonomous vehicles, especially in their ability to measurably increase safety in transportation and positively impact the environment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
19 minute read'The Front Line of Regulating AI': Manatt's Brandon Reilly on CPPA's Move to Adopt New Data Broker and AI Rules
Litigation Leaders: Laura Hoey of Ropes & Gray on Bringing an Industry Focus to Litigation Matters
Trending Stories
- 1Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions
- 2Consumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
- 3Ex-Schnader Partner Nears Settlement in Misappropriated Comp Class Action
- 4The Increase in Artificial Intelligence-Related Securities Class Actions
- 5Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250