Judge Taps Prior Runner-Up as Lead Plaintiff in Tezos ICO Securities Suit
After the lead plaintiff asked to step aside in the proposed securities class action against the organizers of the Tezos initial coin offering, U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg tapped Trigon Trading, the prior runner-up, over a proposed substitute lead plaintiff.
April 08, 2019 at 04:27 PM
3 minute read
With the lead plaintiff in the proposed securities class action against the organizers of the Tezos initial coin offering asking to step aside, the San Francisco federal judge overseeing the case has tapped the runner-up in the earlier competition for the lead spot to replace him.
Initially lead plaintiff Arman Anvari, an attorney who previously practiced at Latham & Watkins, Baker McKenzie, and Perkins Coie, asked to bow out of the case earlier this year. The move came after defense lawyers at Cooley and Baker Marquart identified pseudonyms they believe Anvari adopted on social media sites which used anti-Semitic slurs in reference to Arthur and Kathleen Breitman. The Breitmans are the husband-and-wife team behind Tezos, the digital currency platform that raised $232 million in cryptocurrency for an ICO that became bogged down in technical delays, sparking a string of class action lawsuits.
Anvari's lawyers at HGT Law and LTL Attorneys had asked to substitute a new lead plaintiff, Artiom Frunze, who claimed even more losses than the $264,007.50 worth of ether cryptocurrency Anvari allegedly had tied up in the Tezos ICO.
But on Monday, U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg, who is overseeing the Tezos securities litigation, found that Frunze first applied for lead plaintiff outside the 60-day notice period outlined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, which regulates securities cases in the federal courts.
Seeborg instead named Trigon Trading Pty. Ltd., which had the second-highest alleged losses among the initial batch of candidates, as lead plaintiff. The judge, however, allowed HGT Law's Hung Ta, one of Anvari's lawyers, to remain as co-lead counsel in the case alongside Trigon's lawyers at Block & Leviton, noting that the current lead counsel had already litigated the case past a defense motion to dismiss. Seeborg wrote Monday that “in light of Anvari's counsels' extensive work and knowledge of the case, the class would benefit from their continued prosecution of this case.”
The judge, also on Monday, denied a defense proposal to re-open the PSLRA notice process and denied a pending class certification motion in the case, but granted leave to amend.
Neither Ta nor lawyers at Block Leviton immediately responded to messages seeking comment Monday.
Tezos' backers were hit with class action lawsuits starting in November 2017 alleging that the blockbuster ICO, where investors prepaid for digital tokens that were expected to trade on the Tezos blockchain, violated U.S. securities laws and misled investors. Seeborg allowed the claims against the Breitmans and Dynamic Ledger Solutions, the blockchain company they co-founded, to move past a motion to dismiss in August 2018. The Tezos token, XTZ, launched the month after Seeborg's ruling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
Visa CLO-Turned-Vice Chair Seeing Payoff From Expanded Role
Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250