Desmarais Unveils San Francisco Office as Firm Goes Bicoastal
New York IP firm Desmarais seeks to build its footprint on the West Coast.
June 12, 2019 at 02:40 PM
4 minute read
As it looks to grow on the West Coast, New York intellectual property firm Desmarais has officially planted its flag in San Francisco, opening its second office at 101 California St., as announced last year. Desmarais, now a 55-lawyer firm, was founded in 2010 by John Desmarais, who had been head of the intellectual property litigation practice at Kirkland & Ellis, where he practiced for a decade. Since announcing in October that the firm planned to open a San Francisco office, Desmarais has spent much of his time flying from coast to coast. "I was originally thinking that we'll just stay in New York, but over time, the logic of opening in San Francisco became inescapable, in light of our client base and the great legal talent out here," Desmarais said. The firm's Silicon Valley clients include Apple Inc., Cisco Systems Inc. and Intel Corp. Partner Peter Magic, who is in charge of the firm's California growth, said having a San Francisco office takes the firm's "ability to service clients to the next level." "It's an extra level of service to be able to be right in their backyard and next door to their office, and be able to see them more frequently," Magic said. He said it is also beneficial "to be able to recruit form the same talent pool that they are familiar with and respect, coming from Berkeley and Stanford, schools out here." Magic, who joined Desmarais' firm from Kirkland in 2014, will work closely with Desmarais to help the firm build out its practices in California. They have already recruited three other associates in San Francisco, and New York-based partner Ameet Modi is also expected to join the West Coast group by the end of this year. "I am excited to be a part of the process of growing our presence here," said Modi, a University of California, Berkeley graduate who also joined Desmarais from Kirkland in 2010. "A lot of talent is out there that we'll have more access to and more connections with." (Both Magic and Desmarais have passed the California bar exam, and Modi is taking the exam this July.) As of now, the San Francisco office can hold about 15 lawyers and five staff members. However, the lease at 101 California allows the firm to further expand its office space if needed in the future, Desamarais said. "The hard part is finding the talent, even in the Bay Area where there are a lot of talented people," Magic said. "What we look for is people who are really interested in patent litigation, really interested in being trial lawyers, and who just have the enthusiasm and the drive to work on any technology that our clients may bring to us for cases." |
Plotting Growth in California
California is one of the top jurisdictions for patent litigation, Desmarais said. With a high concentration of companies located here needing patent services, it makes the state an attractive market for the firms seeking to expand IP practice. When asked how the firm plans to compete with abundance of bigger and smaller firms in California, Desmarais responded: "We are very different from everybody else here, literally everybody else." Unlike most traditional law firms, Desmarais does not bill by the hour. Instead, the firm arranges a monthly bill or flat fee with clients in advance, according to Desmarais. "We don't give them a large team of people just running up the billable hour," he said. "From the start of the matter [we] put on a trial team, and we run the case like an efficient trial team from the beginning to the end." As a trial firm, Desmarais put significant effort into training its attorneys as trial lawyers, including offering mock trial training for associates, as well as lectures on depositions, arguments and other aspects of litigation. "When you hire us, you get a team of lawyers, whether they are partners or associates, that have been battle tested many times on trials. We have a very impressive record of success in those trials, so people feel comfortable hiring us for that type of work," Desmarais said. |
Read More
N.Y. IP Boutique Desmarais to Open in San Francisco Litigation Boutique Desmarais is All In on AFAs
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuits, AI Accuracy and Debt: Legal Tech Companies that Ran Into Trouble in 2024
Legal Tech Startups That Google-backed Venture Firms Invested in Throughout 2024
The Legal Tech M&As That Changed the Legal Tech Market in 2023
Trending Stories
- 1'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 2Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 3Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 4Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
- 5Burr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250