Innovations in Diversity and Inclusion: Littler Mendelson
Over the past four years, minority associates in the firm's Career Advocacy Program represented 12% to 40% of each new shareholder class.
October 30, 2019 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
Littler Mendelson's Career Advocacy Program pairs minorities and attorneys who have identified themselves as LGBTQ or differently abled with firm leaders and general counsel of the firm's clients, including NBCUniversal, Verizon and others, for mentorship and leadership development. The program garnered the firm one of three Innovations in Diversity and Inclusion Awards that will be honored at the California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards. The Recorder recently caught up with Natalie Pierce, a San Francisco-based co-chair of the firm's Diversity and Inclusion Counsel who developed the program, to discuss how it came together.
The firm's Career Advocacy Program pairs participants with leaders within the firm and with clients for mentorship and leadership development. How important is the client component of those opportunities?
Natalie Pierce: The client champions that participate in the Career Advocacy Program are critical to development of the associate protégés, providing them with access to C-suite decision-makers that help guide their career development. As part of the program, each champion meets privately with a small group of protégés to share insight on how they achieved success, how to take ownership of one's career, and what they look for in their relationship counsel. Former protégés that have been promoted to shareholder have attributed the support and encouragement from champions as instrumental to their career progression.
How do you measure success in a program such as this?
One goal of the Career Advocacy Program is to provide opportunities for influential shareholder advocates to participate in developing Littler's diverse talent and helping them gain business development skills and have access to experiences that position them for success.
At the beginning of the program, each advocate-protégé pair identifies both short- and longer-term goals for the protégé. This initial plan serves as a guidepost for the advocate's and protégé's efforts, and is adjusted or supplemented as needed. This plan is used to assess the success of the program and the particular advocate-protégé pairing. The areas for development that the program focuses on are: business development/client relationships, management skills, profile and networking. We compare the results with the firm's history of retention and promotion, and over time, determine if the program is making a positive impact.
Littler has tracked the progress of the program since its inception, and the numbers demonstrate that it is making a difference. Over the past four years, protégés represented 12% to 40% of each new shareholder class. Another unique indicator of CAP's success is that 15 former protégés—who have all been elevated to shareholder—continue to participate in the program.
We are continually evaluating the program and refining how we monitor progress and ensure accountability.
What are Littler's biggest challenges in fostering diversity among all levels of the firm?
Effectively retaining and advancing diverse lawyers has been a challenge across the legal industry. Before launching the Career Advocacy Program, we recognized that fostering diversity among all levels doesn't always happen naturally—whether it be a diverse attorney seeking a mentor or a successful shareholder looking to share his or her knowledge with an up-and-coming attorney. Through this program and other diversity initiatives, it has become evident that when a successful partner or client is given a framework within which to mentor someone, they welcome the opportunity.
Diversity is also a fundamental part of who we are as a firm and the commitment to fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace comes from the top of the firm. It is this permission to be bold that gives us the courage to break orthodoxies, and I think some of our best initiatives have been launched with that mindset.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250