In 2020, Resolve to Turn Over a Social Media Leaf
There is no shortage of potential clients on the top social networks.
January 07, 2020 at 12:55 PM
6 minute read
This is the latest in a monthly series of The Marketing Department, where Legal Marketing Association members get candid about growing your practice and raising your profile. Check back in the months ahead for the latest developments in PR/communications, business development, client relations, technology and other areas.
Thirty years after becoming widely available, the internet remains full of opportunity for those who embrace it as part of their marketing and business development strategy, and full of pitfalls for the unwary. Social media platforms are no exception. Lawyers and law firms have increasingly used LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and other tools to develop reputations as thought leaders and to grow their professional networks and practices. As with any communications media though, care is required to succeed.
To the risk averse—no doubt a large portion of the legal community—the very potential of a negative outcome might be enough to completely quash the idea of pursuing personal or firm-branded social media efforts. Being aware of such pitfalls can and should serve as guardrails for activity, however, not as a reason to avoid what could become a valuable communications asset.
|The Opportunity
By far, social media was the dominant force on the web during the 2010s and likely will continue in that fashion at least during the 2020s. According to a report by Statista, as of 2018, in the United States alone, 244 million people, or 79% of the population, had a social media profile. By 2023, that number is expected to increase by 13 million. There is no shortage of potential clients on the top social networks.
When it comes to shopping for legal services, Clio's Legal Trends Report 2019 revealed that 57% of surveyed clients searched for a lawyer on their own, including through online search engines and social media. According to the American Bar Association's 2018 Legal Technology Survey of 4,000 ABA members, 35% of respondents who use social media for professional purposes have been rewarded with clients as a result, either directly or through a referral.
Generational trends are crucial to consider as well. As of August 2018, according to a survey by eMarketer, 90.4% of millennials, 77.5% of Generation X, and 48.2% of Baby Boomers are active social media users. As millennials increasingly become decision-makers and purchasers of legal services, reliance on a lawyer's online presence to establish credibility in their practice areas will likely accelerate.
|The Pitfalls
Before we discuss the steps lawyers and their firms should take to get up to speed on social media, we must acknowledge a few of the potential problems. The first is discussion of clients, either with regard to active representation or general commentary on their actions.
Beyond the state-by-state ethical and professional conduct guidelines, a social media post should never harm the relationship with a client, or the strategic position or goals of a client. In larger firms especially, a lawyer wishing to post on, for instance, a company's activities may not be aware a client relationship exists. In this case, it's wise to always check for such a relationship beforehand. Likewise, language that could be considered defamatory, plagiarism, harassment or copyright or trademark violations are potential hazards. In California, lawyers should also be wary of language that implicitly or explicitly expresses their availability for employment, in the wake of California Rule of Professional Conduct 1-400, finalized in late 2016.
By and large, these concerns can be alleviated by the creation and enforcement of a defined blogging/social media policy, or following existing firm policies.
|Your First Steps
Choose Your Desired Audience, And Set Up Where They Are: For lawyers practicing in business law, the platform of choice is LinkedIn. According to the company, there are 46 million B2B decision-makers on the platform, and 10 million C-level executives. For other lawyers focusing more on individuals as potential clients, Facebook or Twitter are a better bet. If the emphasis is younger clients, and you feel you could produce high-quality, regular visual content, Snapchat and Instagram are currently where that audience primarily resides. At least initially, pick a single platform and develop your influence there.
Start Slow: You don't have to devote large amounts of time to finding interesting content and writing the perfect post. A few minutes of catching up on your feed and industry news can provide a good basis for a quick post. Sharing others' posts, including ones from an official firm account if available, is an easy way to stay active.
Post Reliably: Think about your favorite newspaper columnist, blogger or even YouTuber. The reason you keep going back to consume their content is that you can always count on them to produce something new. Pick a day, or a few days, every week to share something new.
Be Patient: If your first few posts don't receive much engagement, don't be discouraged. Many lawyers have invested years building their reputations online through regular posting. Focus on adding meaningfully to the online conversation, and the rest will follow in time.
Share Your Passions: Discuss the areas of the law and other topics you find most fascinating. Your enthusiasm will be obvious and contagious, and will make others with similar interests want to connect with you and interact with your posts.
At its core, marketing and business development is about creating and nurturing relationships, and social media makes this possible on a large scale. Lawyers who embrace this ever-changing tool, invest the time in building their presence and remain cautious with what they share will reap the rewards. The alternative is leaving relationships and revenue on the table.
J.P. Laub is a marketing technology manager at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP in Los Angeles, where he oversees the firm website, social media accounts and other marketing tools.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Nothing Is Good for the Consumer Right Now': Experts Weigh Benefits, Drawbacks of Updated Real Estate Commission Policies
FTC Issues Final Rule Banning Most Noncompetes, but Immediate Legal Challenges Ensue
6 minute readCalif. Employers On Tight Deadline to Comply With New Workplace Violence Prevention Law
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'America's Next Top Model' Contestant Says Ye Assaulted Her
- 2LexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
- 3'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
- 4Baker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
- 5PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250