Plaintiffs in Tezos ICO Class Action Reach Ground-Breaking $25M Settlement Deal
The proposed deal, reached after two rounds of mediation, would leave open the question of whether the initial coin offering qualified as a securities offering, which would have required the Tezos backers to file a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
March 20, 2020 at 08:31 PM
3 minute read
In what appears to be a first-of-its-kind settlement, the Tezos Foundation has agreed to pay $25 million to settle claims brought on behalf of investors who claimed that the blockbuster initial coin offering on the Tezos blockchain violated U.S. securities laws.
Lead plaintiffs counsel at HGT Law and Block & Leviton filed court papers Friday detailing the proposed deal brought by investors who claimed they lost money in the the July 2017 ICO, which raised the equivalent of $232 million in Bitcoin and Ethereum from those seeking to buy so-called XTZ tokens before the project was bogged down in delays and infighting at the Swiss foundation formed to promote it.
The proposed deal, reached after a November 2019 mediation in New York before retired federal judge Layn Phillips, still requires the sign off of U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California. Seeborg in 2018 let the lawsuit survive motions to dismiss brought on behalf of defendants, including Arthur and Kathleen Breitman, the husband-and-wife team behind Tezos, their California-based company Dynamic Ledger Solutions, which developed the underlying blockchain technology, and Tezos Stiftung, the Swiss foundation set up to oversee the ICO.
The settlement, which came after a prior unsuccessful round of mediation, leaves unanswered the underlying legal questions of whether the ICO qualified as a securities offering requiring the Tezos backers to file a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and whether the Breitmans were "controlling persons" under the Securities Act of 1933. Plaintiffs counsel indicated that damage estimates discussed at the mediation ranged from anywhere between $1 million and and $150 million.
"Lead Counsel is unaware of previous securities settlements that are substantially similar to the Settlement here," the plaintiffs lawyers wrote. "Federal Plaintiffs believe that the proposed $25,000,000 Settlement is an excellent result for the Settlement Class in light of all of the risks of continued litigation, and falls well within a range of what is considered fair, reasonable, and adequate."
The claims administrator hired by the plaintiffs to identify class members and calculate their alleged losses in the ICO estimates 7,579 of the 30,317 potential settlement class members will submit claim forms. With plaintiffs counsel indicating that they will request up to $8,333,333, or one-third of the settlement funds, the deal would work out to about $547 per class member, or $2,177 for each class member filing a claim should the administrator's estimate hold true. Individual payouts, however, would vary based on the amount of investment made at the time of the ICO and the difference in the price of XTZ between purchase and sale.
HGT Law's Hung Ta and Block & Leviton's Jeffrey Block didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Patrick Gibbs at Cooley and Brian Klein at Baker Marquart, who represent the Breitmans and Dynamic Ledger Solutions, didn't respond to messages. Davis Polk & Wardwell's Neal Potischman, who represented the foundation, declined to comment.
Correction: An earlier version had the wrong first name for Jeffrey Block.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Litigation Trends to Watch From Law.com Radar: Suits Strike at DEI Policies, 'Meme Coins' and Infractions in Cannabis Labeling Litigation Trends to Watch From Law.com Radar: Suits Strike at DEI Policies, 'Meme Coins' and Infractions in Cannabis Labeling](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bc/5a/820278a64294a8f3d9e0b573cb26/target-store-01-767x633.jpg)
Litigation Trends to Watch From Law.com Radar: Suits Strike at DEI Policies, 'Meme Coins' and Infractions in Cannabis Labeling
4 minute read![On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b4/76/3db1a19e4d638d10ee312bb5bc46/2025-top-laterals-integration-767x633.jpg)
On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners
7 minute read![States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/therecorder/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/02/Donald-Trump_4-767x633-1.jpg)
![Judge Grills DOJ on Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Executive Order Judge Grills DOJ on Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Executive Order](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/46/de/3d9e496243c5b9f39f300411ea58/sorokin-leo-2014-59-767x633.jpg)
Judge Grills DOJ on Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250