Plaintiffs in Tezos ICO Class Action Reach Ground-Breaking $25M Settlement Deal
The proposed deal, reached after two rounds of mediation, would leave open the question of whether the initial coin offering qualified as a securities offering, which would have required the Tezos backers to file a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
March 20, 2020 at 08:31 PM
3 minute read
In what appears to be a first-of-its-kind settlement, the Tezos Foundation has agreed to pay $25 million to settle claims brought on behalf of investors who claimed that the blockbuster initial coin offering on the Tezos blockchain violated U.S. securities laws.
Lead plaintiffs counsel at HGT Law and Block & Leviton filed court papers Friday detailing the proposed deal brought by investors who claimed they lost money in the the July 2017 ICO, which raised the equivalent of $232 million in Bitcoin and Ethereum from those seeking to buy so-called XTZ tokens before the project was bogged down in delays and infighting at the Swiss foundation formed to promote it.
The proposed deal, reached after a November 2019 mediation in New York before retired federal judge Layn Phillips, still requires the sign off of U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California. Seeborg in 2018 let the lawsuit survive motions to dismiss brought on behalf of defendants, including Arthur and Kathleen Breitman, the husband-and-wife team behind Tezos, their California-based company Dynamic Ledger Solutions, which developed the underlying blockchain technology, and Tezos Stiftung, the Swiss foundation set up to oversee the ICO.
The settlement, which came after a prior unsuccessful round of mediation, leaves unanswered the underlying legal questions of whether the ICO qualified as a securities offering requiring the Tezos backers to file a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and whether the Breitmans were "controlling persons" under the Securities Act of 1933. Plaintiffs counsel indicated that damage estimates discussed at the mediation ranged from anywhere between $1 million and and $150 million.
"Lead Counsel is unaware of previous securities settlements that are substantially similar to the Settlement here," the plaintiffs lawyers wrote. "Federal Plaintiffs believe that the proposed $25,000,000 Settlement is an excellent result for the Settlement Class in light of all of the risks of continued litigation, and falls well within a range of what is considered fair, reasonable, and adequate."
The claims administrator hired by the plaintiffs to identify class members and calculate their alleged losses in the ICO estimates 7,579 of the 30,317 potential settlement class members will submit claim forms. With plaintiffs counsel indicating that they will request up to $8,333,333, or one-third of the settlement funds, the deal would work out to about $547 per class member, or $2,177 for each class member filing a claim should the administrator's estimate hold true. Individual payouts, however, would vary based on the amount of investment made at the time of the ICO and the difference in the price of XTZ between purchase and sale.
HGT Law's Hung Ta and Block & Leviton's Jeffrey Block didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Patrick Gibbs at Cooley and Brian Klein at Baker Marquart, who represent the Breitmans and Dynamic Ledger Solutions, didn't respond to messages. Davis Polk & Wardwell's Neal Potischman, who represented the foundation, declined to comment.
Correction: An earlier version had the wrong first name for Jeffrey Block.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readSupreme Court Drops Facebook's Appeal in Securities Case as 'Improvidently Granted'
How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250