• Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans

    Publication Date: 2012-12-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-12-13
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiffs and Appellants: Moss & Murphy, Glen L. Moss Attorneys for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants upon the request of the Court of Appeal: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California; Brian E. Nelson; Travis LeBlanc, Special Assistant Attorneys General; Frances T. Grunder, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Benjamin G. Diehl, Supervising Deputy Attorney General; Todd I. Espinosa; Samuel J. Maselli; Amy Teng, Deputy Attorneys General
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents: Bryan Cave, LLP, James Goldberg, Berrie Goldman Attorneys for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents Wells Fargo Bank: Severson & Werson, Jan T. Chilton, Jon D. Ives

    Case Number: No. A133071

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 13688ALLEN PFEIFER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS et al.,

  • Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. BrainLAB Medizinische Computersystems GmbH

    Publication Date: 2010-05-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-26
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Bryson, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 2009-1058, -1059

    Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE.Medtronic Navigation, Inc., Medtronic Sofa

  • Ayala v. Wong

    Publication Date: 2012-08-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-08-29
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Irma E. Gonzalez, Chief District Judge, Presiding Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robin L. Phillips and Anthony J. Dain of Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP, San Diego, California, for petitioner-appellant Hector Juan Ayala.
    for defendant: Robin H. Derman, Deputy Attorney General of California, San Diego, California, for defendant-appellee Robert K. Wong, Warden.

    Case Number: No. 09-99005

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 9932 HECTOR JUAN AYALA, Petitioner- ant, v. ROBERT K. WONG, Warden, Respondent-

  • Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-28
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding Before: WALLACE, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Arthur W. Harrigan, Jr., Christopher Wion, Shane P. Cramer, Danielson Harrigan Leyh & Tollefson LLP, Seattle, WA; David T. Pritikin, Constantine L. Treta, Jr., Richard A. Cederoth, Robert N. Hochman, Nathaniel C. Love, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL; Carter G. Phillips, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, D.C.; T. Andrew Culbert, David E. Killough, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, attorneys for Appellee.
    for defendant: Derek L. Shaffer, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington D.C.; Kathleen M. Sullivan, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for Appellants.

    Case Number: No. 12-35352

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 11223MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation,Plaintiff - Appellee,v.MOTOROLA,

  • Sherman v. Koch

    Publication Date: 2010-10-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-15
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Manion, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-1455

    ARGUED FEBRUARY 10, 2010Before RIPPLE, MANION, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.In 2007, Illinois amended Section 1 of the Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act making mandatory a period of silen

  • Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital

    Publication Date: 2009-08-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-08-28
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: David Medina Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-0783

    Argued September 11, 2008JUSTICE MEDINA delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFERSON, JUSTICE O'NEILL, JUSTICE BRISTER, and JUSTICE GREEN joined.CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFERSON f

  • Plotnik v. Meihaus

    Publication Date: 2012-09-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-08-31
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Donna Bader for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants, and Respondents.
    for defendant: Law Offices of Steven R. Young and Jim P. Mahacek for Defendants, Cross-complainant, and Appellants.

    Case Number: No. G045885

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 10285 DAVID PLOTNIK et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. JOHN MEIHAUS, JR., et al.,

  • Mark Norman Cleary v. County of Macomb, et al

    Publication Date: 2011-04-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-02
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: McKeague, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-1441

    NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONFile Name: 11a0068n.06OPINIONBEFORE: MOORE, GIBBONS, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.Mark Norman Cleary was convicted in a state court in Michigan of

  • Renchenski v. Williams

    Publication Date: 2010-10-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-04
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Fuentes, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-3530

    PRECEDENTIALArgued July 12, 2010Before: FUENTES, ALDISERT, and ROTH, Circuit JudgesOPINION OF THE COURTPlaintiff Charles Renchenski is serving a life sentence without the possibility for p

  • Scheenstra v. California Dairies, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2013-01-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-01-30
    Court: C.A. 5th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Law Offices of Brian C. Leighton and Brian C. Leighton for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Fulbright & Jaworski, Robert W. Fischer, Jr., Andrea M. Valdez, for Defendant and Appellant.

    Case Number: No. F062768

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1210JOHN SCHEENSTRA, Plaintiff and lant,v.CALIFORNIA DAIRIES, INC., Defendant and