Filter This View

  • Grappo v. McMills

    Publication Date: 2017-05-23
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-05-23
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Law Office of Kathleen Aberegg, Kathleen Aberegg, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Hartog, Baer & Hand, Ryan J. Szczepanik, for Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. A147522

    Allegations of complaint failed to support default judgment (Richman, Acting P.J.)

  • Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon

    Publication Date: 2017-05-22
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Employment Litigation
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-05-22
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 16–254

    Hague Service Convention does not prohibit service of process by mail (Alito, J.)

  • Ford Motor Warranty Cases

    Publication Date: 2017-05-09
    Practice Area: Contracts | Civil Procedure
    Industry: Automotive
    Date Filed: 2017-05-08
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Amir M. Nassihi, Paul B. La Scala and Brian P. Ziska for Petitioner.
    for defendant: No appearance for Respondent. Kiesel Law, Paul R. Kiesel, Jeffrey A. Koncius; O'Connor & Mikhov, Steve Mikhov; Gieleghem Law Office, Neil Gieleghem; Strategic Legal Practices, Payam Shahian and Jared V. Walder for Real Parties in Interest.
    Case Number: No. B277725

    Coordination trial judge erred in denying coordination of substantially similar add-on cases (Grimes, J.)

  • Fox Factory, Inc. v. Superior Court (Isherwood)

    Publication Date: 2017-04-28
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry: Manufacturing
    Date Filed: 2017-04-27
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Petitioner, Fox Factory, Inc.: Paul J. Killion, Duane Morris.
    for defendant: Counsel for Respondent, The Superior Court of Santa Clara County: No Appearance for Respondent.
    Case Number: No. H043648

    Foreign plaintiff's choice of California forum not entitled to deference (Elia, J.)

  • John v. Superior Court (Chan)

    Publication Date: 2017-04-24
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2016-05-05
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Aleyamma John, in pro. per., for Petitioner.
    for defendant: No appearance for Respondent. Zakari Law, Raymond Zakari; Law Offices of Brian J. Ward and Brian J. Ward for Real Party in Interest.
    Case Number:

    Vexatious litigant statute's prefiling requirements do not apply to defendant appealing adverse judgment (Chin, J.)

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Georgia Business Litigation 2024

    Authors: Robert C. Port

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. Haeger

    Publication Date: 2017-04-18
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Discovery
    Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
    Date Filed: 2017-04-18
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 15–1406

    Sanctions for bad faith conduct limited to innocent party's attorney fees incurred solely due to misconduct (Kagan, J.)

  • S.H. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2017-04-10
    Practice Area: Damages | Civil Procedure
    Industry: Health Care
    Date Filed: 2017-04-10
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Before: Carlos F. Lucero,* Susan P. Graber, and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven B. Stevens (argued), Steven B. Stevens APC, Los Angeles, California; Martin M. Berman, Law Offices of Martin M. Berman, Palm Springs, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
    for defendant: John Samuel Koppel (argued) and Mark B. Stern, Attorneys, Appellate Staff; Benjamin B. Wagner, United States Attorney; Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General; Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; for Defendant-Appellant.
    Case Number: No. 15-15000

    Foreign country exception to Federal Tort Claims Act barred family's claims arising from child's premature birth at overseas military base (Lucero, J.)

  • Scholes v. Lambirth Trucking Company

    Publication Date: 2017-04-07
    Practice Area: Damages | Civil Procedure | Transportation
    Industry: Transportation
    Date Filed: 2017-03-07
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Vincent E. Scholes, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Anwyl, Scoffield & Steep, James T. Anwyl and Lynn A. Garcia for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. C070770

    Lack of detail in ordinal complaint precluded application of relation-back doctrine for subsequently filed amendment (Raye, P.J.)

  • In re Sterba

    Publication Date: 2017-04-05
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy | Civil Procedure | Diversity
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-04-05
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Kurtz, Dunn, and Jury, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Before: A. Wallace Tashima and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and Edward R. Korman,** District Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Douglas B. Provencher and Janis H. Grattan, Provencher & Flatt LLP, Santa Rosa, California, for Appellant.
    for defendant: Thomas P. Kelly III, Santa Rosa, California, for Appellees.
    Case Number: No. 14-60061

    Ohio statute of limitations governed where application of California statute would unreasonably deny claimant any opportunity to be heard (Korman, J.)

  • Quiles v. Parent

    Publication Date: 2017-03-28
    Practice Area: Damages | Employment Litigation | Civil Procedure
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-03-27
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bryan Schwartz Law and Bryan Schwartz; Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill and Daniel H. Reiss for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Law Office of Stephen A. Madoni and Stephen A. Madoni for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. G054353

    No bond required to stay enforcement of judgment for fees and costs only pending resolution of appeal (by the court)