By Conor Tucker | January 19, 2024
Last Term, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Jack Daniel's v. VIP Products — a case involving interaction between the Lanham Act and the First Amendment. This article traces the lower courts' reactions and applications to that decision.
By Isha Marathe | January 5, 2024
The New York Times' copyright infringement lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft is said to be AI's 'Napster Moment.' But observers are torn about the case's legal merits, citing differing views around how exactly LLMs are trained.
By Charles Toutant | January 3, 2024
"This disappointing decision is based on legal and factual errors we are confident will be reversed on appeal," Joseph K. Belanoff, Corcept's CEO, said in a statement.
By Mason Lawlor | December 28, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just filed cases in state and federal courts.
By Justin Henry | December 26, 2023
Plaintiff Zoya Kovalenko's original complaint against drew notice for inadvertently including comments that highlighted perceived weaknesses in her argument.
By ALM Staff | December 21, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By Cassandre Coyer | December 20, 2023
OpenAI and its chatbot ChatGPT repeatedly found themselves in the news this year, partly because they best exemplify the recent advances in generative AI, but also because the two sometimes found themselves in hot water.
By Sushila Chanana and Vanessa K. Ing | December 15, 2023
Many more jury trials will be required if judges must refrain from deciding whether the purpose of a generative AI system's use of copyrighted material to learn language patterns is to produce a new product or to replicate the creative expression of the copyrighted material, according to Sushila Chanana and Vanessa K. Ing of Farella Braun + Martel.
By Mason Lawlor | December 12, 2023
A long-running battle over the copyrights to one of the best-selling video games of all time has come to a close with a settlement, after a California state court entered its amended final statement of decision, determining there were no actual damages.
By Monica Arnold and Michelle Armond | December 11, 2023
From life sciences to industrial designs to trade shows, these decisions spanned a wide variety of patent law issues and signal that Constitutional patent rights are still exploring new legal questions and breaking new ground almost 250 years after our nation's founding, says Armond Wilson's Monica Arnold and Michelle Armond.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...