By Scott Graham | March 2, 2021
The mammoth verdict comes in the second patent trial before U.S. District Judge Alan Albright and represents a ringing validation of Fortress Investment Group's patent assertion model.
By Scott Graham | March 1, 2021
In seeking some $2 billion, Irell's Morgan Chu points to big payouts Intel has paid out to settle other patent disputes, while Wilmer's William Lee questions why no VLSI employees took the witness stand.
By Scott Graham | February 26, 2021
Once Intel's attorneys opened the door to an expert witness' previous work with Irell & Manella, it led to fireworks over their $250 million successes and a Federal Circuit failure.
By Zack Needles | Karen Sloan | February 26, 2021
In this week's episode, Winston & Strawn partner Michael Tomasulo and associate DaWanna McCray join Law.com intellectual property reporter Scott Graham to talk about a high-stakes patent showdown between Fortress Investment Group and Intel Corp. in the Western District of Texas.
By Scott Graham | February 26, 2021
The case could decide the future of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's administrative patent validity hearings and provide broader answers about who can make final decisions on behalf of the executive.
By Scott Graham | February 22, 2021
The Irell & Manella partner told a Western District of Texas jury Monday that "nearly a billion" Intel processors infringe his client's two patents. But he hasn't given jurors a number, yet. Wilmer's William Lee said the right number is zero for VLSI's "imaginary products."
By Dan Roe | February 22, 2021
The IP firm "hit a high watermark" in 2019 and faced a steep path to growth in 2020, said the firm's CEO. "We always knew that meeting that bar in 2020 was going to be a challenge."
By Scott Graham | February 19, 2021
Apple is arguing to Judge Robert Schroeder and Intel to Judge Alan Albright that the imminent widespread availability of vaccines favors delay till spring or summer of high-stakes showdowns.
By Scott Graham | February 17, 2021
California-based Mad Dogg Athletics registered SPIN and SPINNING with the USPTO 25 years ago. It claims its trademarks are incontestable, no matter what Tom Cruise or Angela Bassett say.
By Grace Tuyiringire | February 16, 2021
California DMV regulations excluding plaintiffs' personalized plates were like the PTO trademark registration restrictions of SLANTS and FUCT—restrictions struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court for violating the First Amendment.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...