By Scott Graham | December 30, 2019
The Pfizer subsidiary argued that the threat of harm, even if years in the future, should be grounds for an injunction. But Fenwick & West partner Jedediah Wakefield had argued for Loxo Oncology that Array was merely speculating.
By Scott Graham | December 27, 2019
An educational nonprofit argued that Office Depot was violating terms of the popular internet license, but Latham & Watkins and Winston & Strawn persuaded the court to take a more narrow view.
By Scott Graham | December 27, 2019
The justices have scheduled six Section 101 cases for votes on Jan. 10. They include a medical diagnostics case that the solicitor general says the court should use to overhaul the law of patent eligibility. HP Inc. and Hikma Pharmaceuticals argue that their cases ought to at least go along for the ride.
By Scott Graham | December 26, 2019
WestView Capital takes a majority stake as Unified looks to scale up plans for deterring patent abuse.
By Scott Graham | December 23, 2019
The government's decision to withdraw 2013 policy guidance will please patent holders but likely upset tech companies, auto makers and ISPs who had urged PTO to stay the course.
By Dan Roffman, FTI Technology | December 18, 2019
Recovering trade secrets, remediating them, and pursuing reparations for losses relating to IP theft is often worth the investment, but only if efforts are strategic.
By Scott Graham | December 17, 2019
The IP litigator led a team of Irell & Manella and Jones Day attorneys in an eight-day trial on behalf of Juno Therapeutics and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. The companies had accused Kite Pharma of infringing a patent on ground-breaking CAR T immunotherapy.
By Scott Graham | December 16, 2019
Buchalter pilots fitness company Health In Motion LLC to a Federal Circuit win over Blackbird Tech LLC, a lawyer-owned company that admits having filed more than 110 patent suits without winning a judgment on the merits.
By Scott Graham | December 12, 2019
The San Jose federal judge says a global dispute over patents that are essential to automotive connectivity belongs in the Northern District of Texas.
By Scott Graham | December 5, 2019
The Federal Circuit rules that the wireless giant is entitled to a jury trial over infringement of its standard-essential patents. The decision wipes out a 2017 bench trial in which U.S. District Judge James Selna had established the "top-down" methodology for evaluating SEPs.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...