NEXT

Latest Stories

January 11, 2013 | The Recorder

Austere Budgets Are the New Normal

The governor's proposed spending plan locks in four years of court cuts that have shifted costs to lawyers and litigants — perhaps permanently.
6 minute read
June 28, 2012 | The Recorder

United States v. Alvarez

8 minute read
May 10, 2013 | The Recorder

On the Move

A weekly report of lawyer moves and law firm changes. Keep abreast of where movers and shakers are going and what they're doing.
4 minute read
July 12, 2013 | The Recorder

Lead Paint Makers Hope to Carry on Winning Streak in CA Trial

California municipalities that filed suit say state's broader public nuisance laws give them an edge, even after corporate defendants defeated a string of similar cases nationwide.
8 minute read
January 17, 2012 | The Recorder

White v. City of Pasadena

7 minute read
August 08, 2013 | The Recorder

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles

7 minute read
September 08, 2004 | The Recorder

An Ounce of Retention

The electronic age has brought about a sea change in the creation, dissemination and storage of exponentially greater volumes of information. Previously unthought-of challenges face those who manage huge flows of information in all kinds of organizations. The much-anticipated Sedona Guidelines have now been released for public comment. These guidelines integrate the emerging legal requirements for records retention with current electronic information technology and records management practices.
5 minute read
June 29, 2007 | Law.com

Faux Judicial Restraint in Full View

Welcome to the Roberts Court, where a hostility to stare decisis masquerades as sobriety.No Subscription Required
6 minute read
July 26, 2011 | The Recorder

Aaron Persky

When building a case, start with the jury instructions, advises the Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge.
12 minute read
May 31, 2006 | The Recorder

To Justices, 'At Will' Means 'At Will'

Hearing arguments in a pair of employment cases Tuesday, the state Supreme Court couldn't see any wiggle room in a fired employee's contract � no matter what may have been implied.
6 minute read