NEXT
Sign in to follow

The Legal Intelligencer

E. Frank Hopkins Seafood, Co., Inc. v. Olizi, PICS Case No. 17-1116 (E.D. Pa. June 15, 2017) Joyner, J. (31 pages).

Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's claims of tortious interference with contractual relations, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, conversion, and civil conspiracy based on plaintiff's former employee setting up his own business and soliciting plaintiff's customers using confidential information he obtained while working for plaintiff. Motion dismissed.
6 minute read

The Legal Intelligencer

Phila. Case Over Asbestos-Infused Talc Could Set Pattern for Series of Claims

The high-profile litigation in Missouri over talcum powder might be beginning to cool down, thanks to a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, but a talc-related litigation in Pennsylvania is beginning to heat up, and may set a pattern for a growing area for tort claims.
5 minute read

New York Law Journal

Hart v. BHH, LLC

Fraud Claims Survive Under Economic Loss Rule's Fraudulent Inducement Exception
3 minute read

National Law Journal

Businesses, Complaining About 'Joint Employer' Rules, Call for Clarity

A FedEx Ground executive on Wednesday urged federal lawmakers to confront business uncertainty over labor regulators' broad interpretation of who is an "employer" when it comes to the collective-bargaining rights of employees. Workers' rights advocates and business groups await a D.C. Circuit decision that could clarify the rules.
14 minute read

Daily Business Review

Downtown Miami FedEx Warehouse Sells for $37 Million

The distribution facility with future development potential trades for $31 million an acre.
4 minute read

Corporate Counsel

Trademark Symbols: Powerful Tools for In-House Counsel?

Though companies often place a high value on protecting their trademarks, some may be missing out on the opportunity to put others on notice of their rights by way of trademark symbols.
4 minute read

Delaware Business Court Insider

Robinson Denies Injunction in Hair Care Infringement Dispute

A Delaware federal judge on Thursday blocked a bid to halt L'Oreal from selling a line of hair care products, ruling that a competitor and one-time acquisition target was unlikely to prove that the cosmetics giant had infringed on the patent underlying its innovative hair treatment system.
3 minute read

New York Law Journal

Vanacore v. Vanco Sales LLC

Oral Agreement Void Under N.Y.'s Statute of Frauds; Breach, Related Claims Dismissed
3 minute read

New York Law Journal

JDS Group Ltd. v. Metal Supermarkets Franchising America, Inc.

TRO Denied in Dispute With Firm's Franchisor Over Use of Replacement Software Program
2 minute read

The Recorder

Hikida v. Workers Compensation Appeals Board

C.A. 2nd; B279412 The Second Appellate District annulled a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board and remanded. The court held that…
5 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Why Embracing Change Is Essential for Your Legal Department

    Brought to you by DiliTrust

    Download Now

  • International Export and Trade Assistance State Law Survey

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • How This Personal Injury Firm Reduced Client Intake Time by 80%

    Brought to you by PracticePanther

    Download Now

  • The Hidden Cost of Bad Reviews: Why Law Firms & Attorneys Can't Afford a Damaged Online Reputation

    Brought to you by Erase.com

    Download Now