By Amanda Bronstad | July 29, 2019
The judge said he would dismiss the case, despite Johnson & Johnson's request not to, but ordered plaintiffs lawyers at the Lanier Law Firm to pay fees and costs.
By Amanda Bronstad | July 29, 2019
U.S. District Judge George Wu of the Central District of California said he would dismiss the case, despite Johnson & Johnson's request not to, but ordered plaintiffs lawyers at the Lanier Law Firm to pay fees and costs.
By Amanda Bronstad | July 26, 2019
A California judge reduced the award to $86.7 million but rejected Monsanto's argument against punitive damages based on an appeals court dismissal this month of a $417 million talc verdict against Johnson & Johnson.
By Amanda Bronstad | July 26, 2019
A California judge reduced the award to $86.7 million but rejected Monsanto's argument against punitive damages based on an appeals court dismissal this month of a $417 million talc verdict against Johnson & Johnson.
By Amanda Bronstad | July 24, 2019
In addressing the reliability of plaintiffs' experts, lawyers on both sides of the multidistrict litigation in New Jersey have cited rulings in prior cases over Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder products.
By Amanda Bronstad | July 17, 2019
Johnson & Johnson insists that plaintiffs attorney Mark Lanier moved to dismiss the case to avoid an upcoming trial. A federal judge has set a hearing for July 29.
By Amanda Bronstad | July 15, 2019
U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria of the Northern District of California, who refused to overturn the verdict Friday, found that Monsanto Co.'s conduct was sufficient to warrant punitive damages of $20 million—a ratio of four times the compensatory damages.
By Amanda Bronstad | July 15, 2019
U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria of the Northern District of California, who refused to overturn the verdict Friday, found that Monsanto Co.'s conduct was sufficient to warrant punitive damages of $20 million—a ratio of four times the compensatory damages.
By Amanda Bronstad | July 2, 2019
U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria appeared poised to reduce the jury's award in the second Roundup trial, but said there was a 'fair amount of evidence" justifying punitive damages.
By Amanda Bronstad | July 2, 2019
U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria appeared poised to reduce the jury's award in the second Roundup trial, but said there was a 'fair amount of evidence" justifying punitive damages.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...
McHenry & Horan, P.C. is a legacy medical malpractice defense firm with offices in Uniondale, NY. We are well respected for our expertis...