Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates
P.C.
75 Ponce De Leon Ave NE Ste 101
Atlanta,
GA 30308(470) 294-1674
www.garymartinhays.com
By Dan Roffman, FTI Technology | December 18, 2019
Recovering trade secrets, remediating them, and pursuing reparations for losses relating to IP theft is often worth the investment, but only if efforts are strategic.
Connecticut Law Tribune | News
By Robert Storace | December 3, 2019
A jury has awarded $839,423 to LBI Inc., a small Groton business, in a trade-secrets theft case against Charles River Analytics Inc.
Connecticut Law Tribune | News
By Robert Storace | November 19, 2019
Former Graham Capital Management analyst Steven Bongiovanni unsuccessfully sought to collect on attorney fees after beating back a motion for preliminary injunction from his former employer.
By Raychel Lean | November 11, 2019
Christopher Spuches of Agentis in Coral Gables and Javier J. Rodriguez of Saul Ewing Arhnstein & Lehr in Miami handled a complex, three-week trial involving an alleged clandestine scheme and a mysterious IP address more than 5,000 miles away.
By Jane Wester | October 31, 2019
The Attorney General's Office is asking Crane to compel the ad agency to comply with the subpoena without allowing the NRA to review the produced documents in advance.
By Recorder staff | October 30, 2019
The Munger, Tolles & Olson litigation partner had a trio of trade secrets wins for Intel this past year.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Nicole D. Galli | October 22, 2019
Should a company try to identify all of its trade secrets as part of its ordinary course of business? Or should a detailed identification wait until misappropriation and enforcement? In my view, neither of these extremes are satisfactory—and both grossly oversimplify the options.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Seth Sproul and Tucker Terhufen | October 18, 2019
California trade secret law, through California Code of Civil Procedure §2019.210, presents a statutory framework unique among state and federal trade secret laws that requires trade secret plaintiffs to identify the misappropriated trade secrets before discovery commences. Part 1 of this article examines the genesis, purpose, and a leading case interpreting §2019.210. This part reviews two additional cases that interpret §2019.210 and discuss its applications.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Seth Sproul and Tucker Terhufen | October 11, 2019
California trade secret law, through California Code of Civil Procedure §2019.210, presents a statutory framework unique among state and federal trade secret laws that requires trade secret plaintiffs to identify the misappropriated trade secrets before discovery commences. This article examines the genesis, purpose, and leading cases interpreting §2019.210.
Corporate Counsel | Expert Opinion
By Danielle Joy Healey | September 30, 2019
When a recession hits, businesses face challenges in protecting their intellectual property. One of the biggest issues is how to protect your trade secrets when employees are leaving the company due to layoffs or reorganization or simply to find a more stable position.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
