David Zaslowsky

November 19, 2020 | New York Law Journal

In their International Litigation column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky look at the question of how courts decide the issue of personal jurisdiction in the context of enforcing international arbitration awards.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

10 minute read

September 23, 2020 | New York Law Journal

In their International Litigation Column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky discuss recently proposed Guidelines for the proper behavior of lawyers and arbitrators in international arbitration.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

9 minute read

July 22, 2020 | New York Law Journal

In their column on International Litigation, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky examine a recent case from a federal district court in California addressing this issue.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

10 minute read

May 27, 2020 | New York Law Journal

In their International Litigation column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky discuss how courts have recently opened up new opportunities for obtaining evidence abroad for use in U.S. arbitrations, and within the United States for use in foreign arbitration proceedings.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

10 minute read

March 25, 2020 | New York Law Journal

In their International Litigation column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky discuss three recent court decisions from three different countries, each of which offers an example of a court not deferring to an arbitrator."

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

11 minute read

January 22, 2020 | New York Law Journal

In their International Litigation column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky examine some of the more innovative ways that the recently-promulgated CEA Code of Best Practices in Arbitration (together with the Model Arbitration Rules annexed to the Code) deal with the various participants to arbitration, including arbitral institutions, arbitrators, lawyers, expert witnesses, tribunal secretaries and third-party funders.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

11 minute read

November 20, 2019 | New York Law Journal

In their International Litigation column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky discuss two recent important circuit court decisions on the topic of §1782 discovery, one holding that the statute can be used in aid of private arbitration and the other holding that the statute can apply to documents located outside the United States.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

11 minute read

September 25, 2019 | New York Law Journal

In their International Arbitration column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky discuss the recent case 'P v. D' where the English High Court set aside an international arbitration award because of the failure of the successful party's counsel to conduct the kind of cross-examination required by Browne v. Dunn. Evidently, the arbitration proceeding, which took place in England, was not conducted in accordance with the IBA Rules.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

9 minute read

July 24, 2019 | New York Law Journal

In their International Litigation column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky look back at the international litigation and arbitration issues decided in the U.S. Supreme Court's most recently ended term, specifically, decisions relating to service of process under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, the immunity of international organizations, and class action arbitration.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

10 minute read

May 23, 2019 | New York Law Journal

In their International Arbitration column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky write that while there had been, at one time, no international award rendered in New York that had “ever been set aside in the Second Circuit on the ground of manifest disregard,” some recent New York decisions indicate that that statement can no longer be made.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

11 minute read