NEXT

Evan H Krinick

Evan H Krinick

October 11, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Appellate Review

Evan H. Krinick, a partner with Rivkin Radler, reviews recent Appellate Division, Second Department, dissenting opinions, which may not only allow a party to take an appeal as of right to the Court of Appeals but can often provide the intellectual basis for change in the law.

By Evan H. Krinick

8 minute read

November 14, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Appellate Review

Evan H. Krinick and Howard M. Merkrebs, partners with Rivkin Radler, review recent Second Department cases that involve a wide range of medical malpractice issues, including punitive damages, contribution, failure to prosecute and neglect in prosecution.

By Evan H. Krinick and Howard M. Merkrebs

8 minute read

June 13, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Appellate Review

Evan H. Krinick and Frank J. Giliberti, partners at Rivkin Radler, write that disputes arising from commercial and residential construction typically involve a wide variety of legal issues and parties, as illustrated by recent appellate decisions in construction cases originally filed in state Supreme Court on Long Island.

By Evan H. Krinick and Frank J. Giliberti

9 minute read

April 07, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Consequential Damages Claim Against Insurer Permitted

Evan H. Krinick and Michael A. Troisi, partners at Rivkin Radler, write that although the impact of Bi-Economy Market, Inc. v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of New York remains to be seen, one thing is clear: The decision will lead to significant litigation over its meaning, with claims for consequential damages added to many bad faith claims against insurers and greatly expanded pretrial discovery to determine the intentions of the parties when they entered into their insurance contracts.

By Evan H. Krinick and Michael A. Troisi

10 minute read

March 08, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Appellate Review

Evan H. Krinick, a partner with Rivkin Radler, writes that the Appellate Division, Second Department, has recently decided a variety of interesting commercial disputes arising in Long Island courts.

By Evan H. Krinick

7 minute read

July 08, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Appellate Review

Evan H. Krinick, a partner at Rivkin Radler, reviews recent Second Department decisions dealing with discovery issues, including the inadvertent production of a report authored by a consultant hired by defendant's counsel and waivers of the physician-patient privilege.

By Evan H. Krinick

8 minute read

June 12, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Appellate Review

Evan H. Krinick and Joseph F. Buzzell, partners with Uniondale's Rivkin Radler, write that a number of interesting zoning and land use matters have been resolved recently by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in actions commenced by Long Island's towns and villages.

By Evan H. Krinick and Joseph F. Buzzell

10 minute read

July 13, 2004 | New York Law Journal

Appellate Review

Evan H. Krinick and Peter C. Contino, partners with Rivkin Radler, analyze opinions on issues ranging from the elements of a legal malpractice claim to the applicable statute of limitations, as well as a variety of procedural matters.

By Evan H. Krinick and Peter C. Contino

9 minute read

August 08, 2002 | New York Law Journal

Long Island Appellate Review

When creditors seek to enforce their rights against "financially challenged" debtors, the defendants may attempt to put off what frequently is the inevitable result by appealing trial court rulings. As recent decisions by the Appellate Division, Second Department, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in cases commenced in Long Island courts make clear, however, creditors with suitable documentation who follow appropriate procedures are likely to obtain the relief they seek so long as they ha

By Evan H. Krinick

7 minute read

April 07, 2003 | New York Law Journal

Appellate Review

By Evan H. Krinick

9 minute read