Marianna Wharry

August 25, 2023 | Law.com

This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.

By Marianna Wharry

2 minute read

August 25, 2023 | Law.com

"The public must impliedly have had use of the resource in order for that right to use to have been infringed," the majority wrote. "[Animal Legal Defense Fund] does not show, through case law or legislative intent, that Washington has established that the public has a right to use wildlife or that it has a right to access private property of a zoo."

By Marianna Wharry

4 minute read

August 18, 2023 | Law.com

The split high court agreed with Bell's assertion that he was unlawfully seized when a police officer ordered him to perform the sobriety tests outside his home.

By Marianna Wharry

3 minute read

August 18, 2023 | Law.com

This suit was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.

By Marianna Wharry

2 minute read

August 16, 2023 | Law.com

The suspension of the bill came as the state's public schools started Aug. 16, and the court's decision will allow school districts to continue to choose how to organize their bathrooms and changing facilities. Nye acknowledged that the issues in the case are "'complex' and 'weighty,'" but ultimately asked "what is the status quo that must be preserved pending resolution of Plaintiffs' PI Motion?"

By Marianna Wharry

4 minute read

August 15, 2023 | Law.com

Monday's ruling is the first of its kind for climate change-related litigation, and it occurred after 16 Montana youth filed a complaint in March 2020 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the state, Gov. Gregory Gianforte and multiple state government departments.

By Marianna Wharry

3 minute read

August 15, 2023 | Law.com

The suit was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.

By Marianna Wharry

2 minute read

August 11, 2023 | Law.com

The complaint was first surfaced on Law.com Radar.

By Marianna Wharry

2 minute read

August 10, 2023 | Corporate Counsel

Several major law firms have expressed concern that restrictions under consideration are overly broad.

By Marianna Wharry

4 minute read

August 02, 2023 | Law.com

"This Court reaches its conclusion with deep misgivings," U.S. District Judge for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill wrote. "Vega denies individuals like Dr. Moore the ability to seek a remedy for violations of their Fifth Amendment right to counsel. In so doing, '[t]he majority here, as elsewhere, injures the right by denying the remedy.' It is illogical and perverse to insist that the Constitution guarantees a right while stripping the people of their ability to hold government officials civilly accountable for violating it."

By Marianna Wharry

4 minute read