Marianna Wharry

July 27, 2023 | Law.com

This suit was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.

By Marianna Wharry

2 minute read

July 25, 2023 | Law.com

While Rogers did not receive any financial benefit from the deposit or withdrawal of funds, he also did not inform the court of the transfer of R.J.'s property interest or the $23,000 payment from the transfer.

By Marianna Wharry

3 minute read

July 21, 2023 | Law.com

The Idaho Supreme Court issued an order last week granting a motion to expedite a lawsuit against the state's attorney general from the supporters…

By Marianna Wharry

3 minute read

July 20, 2023 | Law.com

The suit was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.

By Marianna Wharry

4 minute read

July 17, 2023 | Daily Business Review

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan is representing Grillo's Pickles in a lawsuit alleging competitor Patriot Pickle, represented by Jones Day, has stolen proprietary secret recipes, along with manufacturing and packaging processes, to make its "Whole Foods 365" pickles.

By Marianna Wharry

2 minute read

July 14, 2023 | Law.com

Three school board officials did not reach the threshold to establish that they suffered "severe emotional distress" under Oregon's new anti-doxing law, the Oregon Court of Appeals has held.

By Marianna Wharry

4 minute read

July 14, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

According to the orders granting allocatur, the justices will hear arguments simultaneously in the two cases, in which the Pennsylvania Superior Court reached opposite conclusions regarding coverage.

By Marianna Wharry

4 minute read

July 13, 2023 | Law.com

This suit was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.

By Marianna Wharry

2 minute read

July 10, 2023 | Law.com

"In contrast, here, the pretermination investigation was about Paddock testifying in response to a subpoena—the very action he argues constituted the performance of a public obligation. Therefore, if Paddock can show that he made statements he believed to be true and thus performed a public obligation by testifying truthfully in response to a subpoena, he can show that violation of public policy was a substantial motivating factor for his termination," Chief Judge Rebecca Glasgow wrote on behalf of the court. "And Paddock presented sworn declarations that he testified truthfully, if incorrectly. Thus, he has established a genuine issue of material fact preventing dismissal of his wrongful discharge in violation of public policy claim."

By Marianna Wharry

4 minute read

July 05, 2023 | Law.com

Counsel from Adams & Reese removed a class action complaint against one of the U.S.'s largest waste disposal companies to Louisiana federal court…

By Marianna Wharry

3 minute read