June 07, 2018 | New York Law Journal
Sessions' Justice Department's Pragmatic Approach to Corporate AccountabilityIn their White-Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert look at the “anti-piling on” policy announced by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, which is intended to reduce duplicative punishments when a corporation is accountable to multiple regulatory bodies.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
1 minute read
April 02, 2018 | New York Law Journal
My Lawyer Said It Was OK: 'Scully' and Defending Based on Reliance on CounselWhite-Collar Crime columnists Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: Good faith reliance on counsel can be a powerful weapon in defense counsel's arsenal; but to bring it to bear, counsel may need to overcome procedural challenges borne of skepticism and an unduly narrow view of the doctrine.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
11 minute read
February 07, 2018 | New York Law Journal
White-Collar Criminal Enforcement in the Era of TrumpWhite-Collar Crime columnists Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: White-collar criminal enforcement will continue to evolve in the year ahead, but some predictions can be made based on year one of the Trump administration. Federal law enforcement officials have enunciated a clear focus on non-white-collar crimes and, with numerous vacancies in the Justice Department, this shifting focus is likely to result in a decrease in white-collar investigations and prosecutions.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
10 minute read
December 05, 2017 | Connecticut Law Tribune
Government Makes Manafort's Lawyer a Key Witness Against Him—Ho-hum?White-Collar Crime columnists Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: Mostly lost among the headlines regarding the first charges to be brought by Robert Mueller and the Special Counsel's Office investigating Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election was the simultaneous release of a court opinion compelling one of Manafort's own lawyers to testify in the grand jury. A review of the decision and the indictment indicates that the lawyer is likely to be a key witness against Manafort and Gates at trial.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
26 minute read
December 04, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Government Makes Manafort's Lawyer a Key Witness Against Him—Ho-hum?White-Collar Crime columnists Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: Mostly lost among the headlines regarding the first charges to be brought by Robert Mueller and the Special Counsel's Office investigating Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election was the simultaneous release of a court opinion compelling one of Manafort's own lawyers to testify in the grand jury. A review of the decision and the indictment indicates that the lawyer is likely to be a key witness against Manafort and Gates at trial.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
12 minute read
October 02, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Proposals for a Comprehensive Federal Conviction Expungement LawWhite-Collar Crime columnists Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: The lifelong collateral consequences of a criminal conviction, imposed by state and federal statutes and regulations, can make it nearly impossible for many to obtain gainful employment, support their families or otherwise live productive lives. Unfortunately, under today's federal legal framework, expungement is virtually impossible. Although a near-term legislative fix may be a long shot, recent bipartisan legislation proposed in both houses of Congress shows that the issue at least is on federal lawmakers' radar screen.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
11 minute read
July 31, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Executing Search Warrants in the Digital Age: 'United States v. Wey'White-Collar Crime columnists Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert look at a recent high-profile Fourth Amendment victory for the defense in 'U.S. v. Wey' in light of the Second Circuit's final opinion in 'U.S. v. Ganias,' as well as a recent decision in 'In re 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties,' which declined suppression despite agents' reliance on a search warrant having constitutional infirmities strikingly similar to those in 'Wey.'
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
12 minute read
June 05, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Erosion of the Corporate Attorney-Client Protection in EuropeWhite-Collar Crime columnists Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: Recent investigative actions, including a highly-unusual raid on the Munich office of Jones Day by German authorities, as well some notable European court rulings suggest an erosion of protections for attorney communications and work product in the corporate context. As a result, corporations operating globally face significant uncertainty regarding their ability to maintain confidentiality, especially in the context of internal investigations.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
46 minute read
February 06, 2017 | New York Law Journal
SEC's View on Statute of Limitations Faces Another TestWhite-Collar Crime columnists Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write that given the SEC's increasing reliance on civil disgorgement actions to secure financial recoveries and the expansive breadth of rulings delineating what a defendant can be required to disgorge, the Supreme Court's upcoming decision in 'Kokesh v. SEC' on whether disgorgement is a punitive remedy and covered by the five-year limitations period or an equitable remedy and beyond the statute will have a significant impact on the the agency's enforcement practice and defendants' financial exposure in such cases.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
18 minute read
December 05, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Government Searches: The Trouble With Taint TeamsIn this White-Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert discuss "taint teams" which the government often sets up when it seizes electronically stored documents by means of a search warrant. The taint team tries to segregate out materials protected by the attorney-client privilege to avoid later claims that it improperly accessed such documents. Over the years, a number of courts and practitioners have criticized this "fox guarding the chicken coop" procedure as inherently ill designed to protect the privilege. A recent case from the Eleventh Circuit illustrates just what these skeptical courts and counsel have been concerned about. In that case, privileged information was provided to the trial team without notice to the defendant in violation of the terms of a stipulation providing for a taint team.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
19 minute read
Trending Stories