October 03, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Questionable Extraterritorial Extension of Foreign Corrupt Practices ActWhite-Collar Crime columnists Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert discusses U.S. law enforcement's extraterritorial expansion under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a niche notable for untested legal theories because of the dearth of cases that actually are litigated. Now, however, the Second Circuit has an opportunity to examine the validity of the government's approach in 'United States v. Hoskins', an FCPA case the U.S. Department of Justice currently is prosecuting in the District of Connecticut.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
14 minute read
August 02, 2016 | New York Law Journal
More Bridgegate Fallout: Revealing Unindicted Co-Conspirators?In their White Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write that just as the so-called Bridgegate scandal had a significant impact on a number of prominent careers, and perhaps even on our national politics, the appeal of a media demand for the disclosure of the names of unindicted co-conspirators will also likely have a broad impact, influencing courts' future deference to the reputational interests of individuals implicated but not charged in prominent investigations.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
15 minute read
June 07, 2016 | New York Law Journal
White-Collar Practitioner's Guide to the Supreme Court's TermIn their White-Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: The Supreme Court's 2015 Term promises significant developments for the white-collar bar. The court already has issued three decisions that are noteworthy for white-collar practitioners, with the most significant likely yet to come.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
25 minute read
April 05, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Rise of ABA Task Force's 'Shadow Sentencing Guidelines'In their White-Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: Because the federal sentencing guidelines applicable to fraud cases are widely acknowledged as broken and dysfunctional, particularly in cases where the loss amount is high, sentencing judges may increasingly seek other sources to help guide their discretion. Since its 2014 issuance, perhaps the most thoughtful alternative framework has been that offered by the ABA's Criminal Justice Section Task Force on the Reform of Federal Sentencing for Economic Crimes.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
24 minute read
February 02, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Supreme Court's Upcoming Political Quid Pro Quo CaseIn their White-Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: The inherent tension between the regulation of political corruption and the right to spend money to influence politicians and election outcomes has played out repeatedly in Supreme Court jurisprudence over the past 40 years. In granting certiorari in the case of former Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell, the Supreme Court has again ventured into the quagmire of defining what constitutes an illegal quid pro quo arrangement.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
13 minute read
December 01, 2015 | New York Law Journal
'Spoofing'—the New Frontier for Criminal Prosecution?In their White-Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: Even without its catchy name, the relatively new crime of "spoofing" would seem to appeal to prosecutors seeking to tap into the populist desire for prison time for perceived financial chicanery and the view that high-speed trading has rigged the markets against regular participants. Not surprisingly, therefore, the conviction last month in 'United States v. Coscia', the first criminal trial on spoofing charges, has generated a good deal of attention.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
11 minute read
November 30, 2015 | New York Law Journal
'Spoofing'—the New Frontier for Criminal Prosecution?In their White-Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: Even without its catchy name, the relatively new crime of "spoofing" would seem to appeal to prosecutors seeking to tap into the populist desire for prison time for perceived financial chicanery and the view that high-speed trading has rigged the markets against regular participants. Not surprisingly, therefore, the conviction last month in 'United States v. Coscia', the first criminal trial on spoofing charges, has generated a good deal of attention.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
11 minute read
October 06, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Prosecuting Individuals for Corporate MisconductIn their White-Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: Move over Holder, Thompson, McNulty, and Filip and make room for Yates. Taking its place in the parade of guidelines issued by top DOJ leadership on the topic of prosecuting business organizations comes "Individual Accountability for Corporate Wrongdoing," setting forth six steps to be taken in the investigation of corporate misconduct in order to "fully leverage [the department's] resources to identify culpable individuals...in corporate cases."
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
12 minute read
October 05, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Prosecuting Individuals for Corporate MisconductIn their White-Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: Move over Holder, Thompson, McNulty, and Filip and make room for Yates. Taking its place in the parade of guidelines issued by top DOJ leadership on the topic of prosecuting business organizations comes "Individual Accountability for Corporate Wrongdoing," setting forth six steps to be taken in the investigation of corporate misconduct in order to "fully leverage [the department's] resources to identify culpable individuals...in corporate cases."
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
12 minute read
August 04, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Obstruction? Barry Bonds Prosecutors Strike Out in the NinthIn their White-Collar Crime column, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert write: For white-collar criminal practitioners, the Barry Bonds case presents another example of how the breadth of the federal obstruction laws makes them a nearly irresistible choice for prosecutors, and of the seemingly endless struggle of the courts to define appropriate limits on their reach.
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert
11 minute read
Trending Stories