NEXT

Rudolph J Di Massa Jr

Rudolph J Di Massa Jr

November 15, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Inherited IRAs Not Exempt From Bankruptcy Estate Under New York Law

In a matter of first impression, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New York recently analyzed whether a debtor may exempt from her bankruptcy estate a retirement account that was bequeathed to her upon the death of her parent.

By Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr. and Catherine B. Heitzenrater

7 minute read

October 04, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Court: New Value Need Not Remain Unpaid to Limit Preference Liability

In Kaye v. Blue Bell Creameries (In re BFW Liquidation), 899 F.3d 1178 (11th Cir. 2018), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that a liability for an allegedly preferential transfer may be reduced by the amount of new value given, regardless of whether that new value has already been repaid by the debtor before its bankruptcy filing.

By Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr. and Drew S. McGehrin

8 minute read

August 16, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Effect of Rejected Trademark License Agreement on Rights of Use

Section 365(a) of the Bankruptcy Code permits a debtor or trustee, subject to bankruptcy court approval, to reject an executory contract and release the debtor's estate from burdensome contractual obligations that may impede the debtor's successful reorganization.

By Rudolph J. Di Massa Jr. and Keri L. Wintle

7 minute read

June 29, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Suit Yourself: Actions Against Trustees Not Subject to 'Barton' Doctrine

The Barton doctrine is a legal principle that limits a court's jurisdiction over a cause of action brought against a court-appointed receiver.

By Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr. and Jarret P. Hitchings

2 minute read

May 24, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Prepetition Setoff Not an 'Improvement in Position' Under Bankruptcy Code

In a recent decision out of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia, a court analyzed the effect of a setoff effectuated between two governmental units in the 90 days prior to the filing of a husband and wife's bankruptcy case.

By Rudolph J. Di Massa Jr. and Catherine B. Heitzenrater

8 minute read

April 02, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Second Circuit Court Declines to Enforce Arbitration Clause

In Anderson v. Credit One Bank, Case No. 16-2496 (2d Cir., March 7), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed decisions of both the District and Bankruptcy Courts for the Southern District of New York in addressing the enforceability of arbitration clauses in bankruptcy proceedings.

By Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr. and Drew S. McGehrin

7 minute read

February 15, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Approval of Fee Defense Provisions in Retention Agreements Post-'ASARCO'

The Bankruptcy Code authorizes a debtor (or its bankruptcy trustee) to retain and compensate attorneys and other professionals during the course of the debtor's bankruptcy case.

By Rudolph J. Di Massa Jr. and Jarret P. Hitchings

8 minute read

November 16, 2017 | The Legal Intelligencer

Sovereign Immunity in Bankruptcy Cases: Can a Trustee Sue the State?

Typically, a state governmental entity is immune from suit unless the state explicitly waives its own sovereign immunity with respect to a particular claim or issue.

By Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr. and Catherine B. Heitzenrater

12 minute read

October 05, 2017 | The Legal Intelligencer

Court: Debt to Paramour Obtained by Fraud Partially Nondischargeable

Pursuant to Section 727(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, an individual debtor can obtain a discharge of his pre-petition debts, see 11 U.S.C. Section 727(a). In general, the effect of a discharge is to relieve the debtor from all debts that arose before the date the debtor filed for bankruptcy protection.

By Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr. and Jarret P. Hitchings

22 minute read

August 17, 2017 | The Legal Intelligencer

The Liquidating Fiduciary Exception and Administrative Status

Whether a claimant is entitled to an administrative expense claim, or simply a prepetition claim, can mean the difference between full ­payment of the claim and the recovery of only pennies on the dollar. Accordingly, a significant amount of litigation in bankruptcy cases centers around the priority status to which certain claims are ­entitled. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois has recently issued a decision granting priority status to claimants seeking damages for violation of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (the WARN Act). Given the significant ­liability that debtors could face under the WARN Act, this decision is relevant to all bankruptcy practitioners.

By Rudolph J. Di Massa Jr. 
and Catherine B. Heitzenrater

8 minute read